Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
TC sent a message out yesterday to let Leeds fans know that we were not done in the transfer market
Defenders & a striker seem to be the priority signings we are looking to bring in before the season commences !
We are linked with Flint, Bryan both Bristol City players, also talk of a European international CB in the mix.
Many footy fans fancy for the championship are Aston Villa. So far they have signed :
36yo John Terry
33yo Glen Whelan
33yo Chris Samba
29yo Ahmed Elmohamady
Bruce seems to be relying on some golden oldies to get Villa up
So why are the Villa pensioners strongly fancied, surely not the way to go ?
Defenders & a striker seem to be the priority signings we are looking to bring in before the season commences !
We are linked with Flint, Bryan both Bristol City players, also talk of a European international CB in the mix.
Many footy fans fancy for the championship are Aston Villa. So far they have signed :
36yo John Terry
33yo Glen Whelan
33yo Chris Samba
29yo Ahmed Elmohamady
Bruce seems to be relying on some golden oldies to get Villa up
So why are the Villa pensioners strongly fancied, surely not the way to go ?
- weasel
- Superstar
- Posts: 14166
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Must admit Villa were very underwhelming last season. They threatened a bit after Bruce took over but it was very brief. As such I think they needed a big overhaul and it may take time for the new players to settle. John Terry is very unlikely going to be able to play in all 46 league matches as at his age he will be more prone to picking up minor knocks which won't heal in 2 or 3 days and as such it could lead to the having to change their backline constantly. I certainly wouldn't see them as automatic challengers and think they will do well to finish top 6.
Steve Bruce has gone down the Warnockian route with the oldie signings but how much motivation will those guys have when the going gets tough as they know they won't be kept on if they do get promoted. Does JT's CV really need a promotion with Villa on it?
I much prefer the route we have gone down by signing younger players with their careers ahead of them. Players that want to do well and want to play at a higher level. Sure some won't be able to fulfil their potential and some may not even have the right attitude/work ethic but you would hope that some will.
Steve Bruce has gone down the Warnockian route with the oldie signings but how much motivation will those guys have when the going gets tough as they know they won't be kept on if they do get promoted. Does JT's CV really need a promotion with Villa on it?
I much prefer the route we have gone down by signing younger players with their careers ahead of them. Players that want to do well and want to play at a higher level. Sure some won't be able to fulfil their potential and some may not even have the right attitude/work ethic but you would hope that some will.
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Couldn't have written it better Weaselweasel wrote:Must admit Villa were very underwhelming last season. They threatened a bit after Bruce took over but it was very brief. As such I think they needed a big overhaul and it may take time for the new players to settle. John Terry is very unlikely going to be able to play in all 46 league matches as at his age he will be more prone to picking up minor knocks which won't heal in 2 or 3 days and as such it could lead to the having to change their backline constantly. I certainly wouldn't see them as automatic challengers and think they will do well to finish top 6.
Steve Bruce has gone down the Warnockian route with the oldie signings but how much motivation will those guys have when the going gets tough as they know they won't be kept on if they do get promoted. Does JT's CV really need a promotion with Villa on it?
I much prefer the route we have gone down by signing younger players with their careers ahead of them. Players that want to do well and want to play at a higher level. Sure some won't be able to fulfil their potential and some may not even have the right attitude/work ethic but you would hope that some will.
If I lived in Hector's world I would reply with a 'Ditto'
If any of our relatively unknown signings crack it in the championship with the likelihood of increasing their selling value by £millions then our current scouting system would have to be acknowledged with much credit
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
weasel wrote:Must admit Villa were very underwhelming last season. They threatened a bit after Bruce took over but it was very brief. As such I think they needed a big overhaul and it may take time for the new players to settle. John Terry is very unlikely going to be able to play in all 46 league matches as at his age he will be more prone to picking up minor knocks which won't heal in 2 or 3 days and as such it could lead to the having to change their backline constantly. I certainly wouldn't see them as automatic challengers and think they will do well to finish top 6.
Steve Bruce has gone down the Warnockian route with the oldie signings but how much motivation will those guys have when the going gets tough as they know they won't be kept on if they do get promoted. Does JT's CV really need a promotion with Villa on it?
I much prefer the route we have gone down by signing younger players with their careers ahead of them. Players that want to do well and want to play at a higher level. Sure some won't be able to fulfil their potential and some may not even have the right attitude/work ethic but you would hope that some will.
Ditto
I hate to disappoint Leon....
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Little things like that Hector make my dayhector wrote:Ditto
I hate to disappoint Leon....
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Agree with that Dittohector wrote:Ditto
A bumble bee under the laws of physics shouldnt be able to fly, but it does because no one has told it that it can't
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
You're both ditto madRatscoot wrote:Agree with that Ditto
- weasel
- Superstar
- Posts: 14166
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Don't sell yourself short - there was at least 1 typo1964white wrote:Couldn't have written it better Weasel
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Villa look very strong to me, they have quality all over the pitch:
Premier league quality full backs in DeLaet, Elmohamady and Neil Taylor
John Terry at centre back, I know he is 36 but Terry has never had any pace really or been in the slightest reliant on pace. Incredibly intelligent defender, he wouldn't have been a good signing for us because of his Chelsea career, however, for Villa a team with no real rivalry with Villa I have to say I think it's a great signing.
Midfield Options: Whelan, Jedinak, Hourihane and Lansbury
2 decent wingers at this level in Adomah and Grealish.
And 3 quality strikers at this level McCormack, Kodjia and Hogan
They can play any formation they want and injuries/suspensions really aren't going to affect them with the squad depth they have.
If you compare that to Leeds how many different systems can we play with the current squad?
Only really convinced in a 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1 imo, very unconvinced we could play 3 at the back or 2 up front systems/formations with the current squad we have.
Premier league quality full backs in DeLaet, Elmohamady and Neil Taylor
John Terry at centre back, I know he is 36 but Terry has never had any pace really or been in the slightest reliant on pace. Incredibly intelligent defender, he wouldn't have been a good signing for us because of his Chelsea career, however, for Villa a team with no real rivalry with Villa I have to say I think it's a great signing.
Midfield Options: Whelan, Jedinak, Hourihane and Lansbury
2 decent wingers at this level in Adomah and Grealish.
And 3 quality strikers at this level McCormack, Kodjia and Hogan
They can play any formation they want and injuries/suspensions really aren't going to affect them with the squad depth they have.
If you compare that to Leeds how many different systems can we play with the current squad?
Only really convinced in a 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1 imo, very unconvinced we could play 3 at the back or 2 up front systems/formations with the current squad we have.
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Add Chris Samba to that lot & you have seven players 29yo or overGary Shaw wrote:Villa look very strong to me, they have quality all over the pitch:
Premier league quality full backs in DeLaet, Elmohamady and Neil Taylor
John Terry at centre back, I know he is 36 but Terry has never had any pace really or been in the slightest reliant on pace. Incredibly intelligent defender, he wouldn't have been a good signing for us because of his Chelsea career, however, for Villa a team with no real rivalry with Villa I have to say I think it's a great signing.
Midfield Options: Whelan, Jedinak, Hourihane and Lansbury
2 decent wingers at this level in Adomah and Grealish.
And 3 quality strikers at this level McCormack, Kodjia and Hogan
They can play any formation they want and injuries/suspensions really aren't going to affect them with the squad depth they have.
If you compare that to Leeds how many different systems can we play with the current squad?
Only really convinced in a 4-3-3 and 4-2-3-1 imo, very unconvinced we could play 3 at the back or 2 up front systems/formations with the current squad we have.
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
will they all have to be subbed at half time coz they are knackered??
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Long old season is the championship unlike the prem where they play eight games less.hector wrote:will they all have to be subbed at half time coz they are knackered??
Also prem managers tend to rest players with their vast squads so some players are lucky to play 25 times a season or if you are ex-Leeds player you more likely to get more splinters in your bum than games
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
The Chris Samba signing is a very strange one Leon, last time he played in England for QPR in the premier league he was dreadful. I did think 6-7 years ago when Samba was playing for Blackburn he had enough ability to play for a Everton or Tottenham level of club, however, since he left Blackburn he hasn't looked anywhere near the same level of defender. However, the other 3: Terry, Whelan and Elmohamady are quality additions at this level imo. Whelan has been a key part in Stoke rising up the table over the last few years very underrated player imo, also think Elmohamady is a quality player.1964white wrote:Add Chris Samba to that lot & you have seven players 29yo or over
Terry, Samba and Whelan etc probably won't play anywhere near 46 games, however, Villa have squad depth to cover this.
If Terry and Samba are tired they can play Tommy Elphick and James Chester who are decent players at this level.
If Whelan and Jedinak are tired they can play Henri Lansbury and Hourihane.
Our lack of squad depth in certain positions is evident with the fact that we have 2 weeks to find another centre back, otherwise we are going to be playing a right back (Ayling) and/or Cooper alongside Pennington at centre back. Are lack of quality and depth at centre back and in terms of forwards is a real concern imo.
- weasel
- Superstar
- Posts: 14166
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
The trouble they have though is that the likes of Elphick, Chester, Lansbury and Hourihane will all be thinking they should be starting, how happy are they going to be sat on the bench waiting for injuries/suspension/fatigue? If everyone stays fit then there will be a real problem for Bruce to keep everyone happy not to mention keeping everyone match fit too given who uncompetitive the U23 games seem to be.Gary Shaw wrote:
Terry, Samba and Whelan etc probably won't play anywhere near 46 games, however, Villa have squad depth to cover this.
If Terry and Samba are tired they can play Tommy Elphick and James Chester who are decent players at this level.
If Whelan and Jedinak are tired they can play Henri Lansbury and Hourihane.
Our lack of squad depth in certain positions is evident with the fact that we have 2 weeks to find another centre back, otherwise we are going to be playing a right back (Ayling) and/or Cooper alongside Pennington at centre back. Are lack of quality and depth at centre back and in terms of forwards is a real concern imo.
Obviously it is a double-edged sword as lack of squad depth, like you highlight for us, can be a real problem too. Having players with the flexibility to play one or two matches, when needed, out of their natural position is in my opinion the best way to solve both the problems. We do seem to have edged towards that with players able to play several positions.
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
Still to early to judge the Leeds squad as TC & his backroom staff are prioritising the defence right now & I thnk well see at least three or four more signings before the season commencesGary Shaw wrote:The Chris Samba signing is a very strange one Leon, last time he played in England for QPR in the premier league he was dreadful. I did think 6-7 years ago when Samba was playing for Blackburn he had enough ability to play for a Everton or Tottenham level of club, however, since he left Blackburn he hasn't looked anywhere near the same level of defender. However, the other 3: Terry, Whelan and Elmohamady are quality additions at this level imo. Whelan has been a key part in Stoke rising up the table over the last few years very underrated player imo, also think Elmohamady is a quality player.
Terry, Samba and Whelan etc probably won't play anywhere near 46 games, however, Villa have squad depth to cover this.
If Terry and Samba are tired they can play Tommy Elphick and James Chester who are decent players at this level.
If Whelan and Jedinak are tired they can play Henri Lansbury and Hourihane.
Our lack of squad depth in certain positions is evident with the fact that we have 2 weeks to find another centre back, otherwise we are going to be playing a right back (Ayling) and/or Cooper alongside Pennington at centre back. Are lack of quality and depth at centre back and in terms of forwards is a real concern imo.
Leeds are building for the future with young talent whilst Villa are going down the Warnock route looking for a quick fix !
Re: Friday's Breakfast Debate - Signings/Villa
I am confident that this is the best squad we have had for years, however, I still think it needs 1-2 quality signings to really compete at the top of the table this season.1964white wrote:Still to early to judge the Leeds squad as TC & his backroom staff are prioritising the defence right now & I thnk well see at least three or four more signings before the season commences
Leeds are building for the future with young talent whilst Villa are going down the Warnock route looking for a quick fix !
Think we have to prioritise quality over quantity now: centre back and a versatile forward forward/striker and I think we are really well placed to have an excellent season, think we are just a Bartley and McCormack away from having a top quality squad of players.