Warnock has one of the best records in this league, and Blackwell has done better than any manager since relegation from the Prem. The fans hated Warnock and they call Blackwell Blamewell, so if their intention was to get the fans onside with their bullshit, it's not good bullshit. Heckingbottom's bullshit appears to be working, even though he's not getting results.weasel wrote: ↑Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:54 pm I would agree with you that he speaks the language that football fans can understand and he knows how to get them on side - i.e. dropping lazy foreigner, saying players need to work harder etc. The trouble is that nothing has improved on the pitch and from what I have seen things have got considerably worse. I certainly will not sugarcoat some of the poor performances under TC but you could see it was a work in progress and that there was some sort of end plan, I accepted that as I could see that if it worked and we got the right players in then at some point we'd be playing some lovely football and deservedly winning matches. There were the glimpses of what could be achieved and yes there were times when it simply didn't happen be that because of a limitation of the coach or the players or a combination of both. I just don't see any positives so far from the matches under PH. Yes 7 matches is only a small sample but I would still expect to have seen something to say this guy can walk the walk. He comes across to me as just a b*llshit artist along the lines of Warnock or Blackwell who can trot out the excuses and keep the fans onside.
Same as when we had Terry Venables and he had a reasonable squad but made them a lot worse (before the fire sales). Yet to here TV speak it was as if he was doing wonderfully well with a bunch of awful footballers who hadn't been playing in Europe in recent years and challenging at the top level. TV destroyed what was still a very good side and my fear is PH will destroy what is not far off being a good squad - certainly no need to sell them all as 64 almost suggested recently.
As far as Clive goes I see passion which borders at times on aggression but in the main it has seemed that the more passionate/aggressive posts he has made have been in response to aggressive posts directed at him. Yes maybe because I have agreed with quite a lot of his posts I haven't felt his wrath but equally if I had a different view to his I wouldn't have replied to him in the way some have - i would have tried to argue in a civilised manner and from what I have seen I would have then likely have had a civilised reply.
I hope I wasn't too aggressive or disrespectful, there. I wouldn't want to upset a mod.
64 is very reactionary, he wanted Christiansen out, he wants all the players out and he wants me out!
Although, if we ever have that Grayson debate you'll probably want me out, too.
The funny thing is 64 agrees with me on Grayson, maybe we can gang up on you and bond over that.