The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 15804
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by SG90 »

1964white wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 9:12 am Pontus will be gone in the summer !
Then it shows we have no ambition. He signed a 5 year deal and we're not desperate to sell. Just keep our best players it isn't difficult.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 127720
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by 1964white »

SG90 wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 11:46 am Then it shows we have no ambition. He signed a 5 year deal and we're not desperate to sell. Just keep our best players it isn't difficult.
I agree :tup:

He'll be the first of one of a few assets we'll ship out, we are talking Leeds owners here !

Captain Chaos fit again & ready to lead the team once again :roll:
danhirons
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3476
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:21 pm

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by danhirons »

Ellandback1 wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 8:13 am Question - If Jansson has a good World Cup and an offer comes in between 12-15m, would the club be stupid not to accept it?
Yes.

We could build a whole new squad for that.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 55508
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by The Subhuman »

Well it would buy us a new CB and CF ...we don't need a new squad
"Never debate an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and they have the advantage of experience"
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 15804
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by SG90 »

danhirons wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 12:13 pm Yes.

We could build a whole new squad for that.
We'd need to replace Jansson, buy another quality CB, an experienced CM, two strikers with that. It ain't gonna happen.
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 15804
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by SG90 »

faaip wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 12:23 pm Well it would buy us a new CB and CF ...we don't need a new squad
Agree. We need another CB (alongside Jansson, not a replacement), an experienced CM, maybe another winger and two strikers. Otherwise I think we're ok. I'd like to see the likes of O'Connor, Coyle, Pearce (if he stays), Rey, Klich, Ideguchi, Clarke and Dalby integrated into the squad.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8777
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by Ellandback1 »

SG90 wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 11:24 am Why? We won't replace him.

We need Huth on a free playing alongside him.
Afternoon SG90, Isn't Huth on 40k a week?
User avatar
Gandalf
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11611
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:51 am

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by Gandalf »

Ellandback1 wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 12:59 pm Afternoon SG90, Isn't Huth on 40k a week?
So is Abel Hernandez, and we are apparently in for him according to the YEP.
Delapsus Resurgam - When I fall I shall rise!
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 15804
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by SG90 »

Gandalf wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 1:39 pm So is Abel Hernandez, and we are apparently in for him according to the YEP.
They're both on frees, so the money we'd save on transfer fees would go on wages. Fine by me. Although I think they'd both be on £30k max.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8777
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by Ellandback1 »

Gandalf wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 1:39 pm So is Abel Hernandez, and we are apparently in for him according to the YEP.
Afternoon Gandalf - Makes sense now why Hull are getting rid.

Hope it confuses our opposition (having two Hernandez's) more than it confuses Popey...
User avatar
Ellandback1
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8777
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wed 16 May)

Post by Ellandback1 »

Ellandback1 wrote: Wed May 16, 2018 2:43 pm Afternoon Gandalf - Makes sense now why Hull are getting rid.

Hope it confuses our opposition (having two Hernandez's) more than it confuses Popey...
Or me for that matter:clape:
Post Reply