Leeds don't have an infinite amount of money as such we have to negotiate fees when it comes to signing players. Seems like we did a cracking deal with a proper club, Real Madrid, to get Kiko. However to do a deal you need both clubs to agree and as mentioned Swansea's priorities were to get rid of their high earners. With the high earners gone they no longer needed to sell Dan James and as such they simply ignored us after agreeing a deal. Childish amateur behaviour. Unfortunately it looks like they have come off better because of it with James enhancing his reputation but equally we could have overpaid for a player who failed to live up to his potential - ala Seth Johnson.1964white wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 6:02 pm Believe what you like Weasel we missed a trick there as our previous boards have done so many times in the past
Had we pursued the deal in preparation prior to the January window opening we'd have probably got our man. In the end by leaving it too late we got into a dogfight & we missed out
Even with our best board in a long time Cjay is correct we haven't done enough in the three transfer windows
The pleasing thing is that the quality of the players we are looking to sign certainly is promising. Kiko has been a good signing and it looks like James would have been - happy to take quality over quantity. It bodes well for the future of the club that we are identifying young players with potential and going after them.
But feel free to keep slagging the board off. The only board since Ridsdale that has pumped money from player sales straight back into player purchases. However unlike the Ridsdale reign they are also acting prudently too and not overpaying for players. The long term planning is looking great and the short term planning isn't looking too shabby either.