ditto too
Bamford or Roofe ?
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Re: Bamford or Roofe ?
Bamford.
Better striker, more of a threat in every way.
And clearly Roofe isnt match fit, 0 impact at all since he came back whatsoever.
Roofe needs matches to get fit, a luxury we dont have.
Better striker, more of a threat in every way.
And clearly Roofe isnt match fit, 0 impact at all since he came back whatsoever.
Roofe needs matches to get fit, a luxury we dont have.
Signed
King Cjay
Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
King Cjay
Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
Re: Bamford or Roofe ?
Like a rusty old bin today
Taking off Roberts for Roofe today was ludicrous
Re: Bamford or Roofe ?
I think over a full season, Bamford would score more goals. If we don't go up, sell Roofe as he only has one year left and we could get a decent fee.
Re: Bamford or Roofe ?
Totally agree 64. I thought Roberts was having a decent game , ok he lost possession a couple of times but that's football, on the whole he made some probing passes and spread the play out and maybe should have scored if I remember . Substitutions are not one of MB's strongest areas imo and lately they fail to make any difference or impact at all and even have a negative effect .1964white wrote: Like a rusty old bin today
Taking off Roberts for Roofe today was ludicrous
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk