Did lockdown benefit Leeds United?

27 Jul 2020 03:29 pm, by YorkshireSquare


I know what your thinking, you think I’m talking about ‘Bielsa burnout’ don’t you? But I’m not, that’s not something I buy in to, not from the experience of Marcelo Bielsa at Leeds United. I know the story, at Athletic Bilbao the team was flying, sitting fifth in La Liga, just one point outside the Champions League places but they faded, finishing tenth. At Marseille his team topped the table with 41 points at the halfway stage of the season. But again, they fella way only mustering 28 points during the second half of the season, settling for fourth place. But even when this Leeds United struggled last year they were still running more, creating more than another team. Whatever the reason was for not gaining promotion last season it wasn’t physical burnout.

After the game, the energy levels of the side were questioned, which I found bemusing. Like every side in the division, we have problems, but as a team we do not lack energy. The team has shown in every game this season that they have an excess of energy and I am confident that will continue until the end of the campaign.

Many journalists and pundits have said that the break in the season has favoured Leeds. The team has had chance to recover from the strains put on them by Bielsa and his intensive training sessions and playing style over a long season. But it’s been the same for every team. Brentford came out of the blocks flying, winning six on the bounce whilst Leeds stuttered early on. But when it came down to it, when the pressure was on it was Brentford who bottled it whilst Leeds grew stronger and stronger, winning their final six games of the season and finishing ten points ahead of the chasing pack. I don’t think physical burnout was the issue with Leeds, I think it was mental, pressure does funny things to us.





It wasn’t the first time Leeds United have thrown away chances, I was at Wembley to see us thrashed by Aston Villa in the League Cup, in Cardiff to see us choke the play-offs against Watford and again at Wembley against Doncaster Rovers. Even when Simon Grayson eventually lifted us out of League One we nearly blew it, nearly threw it away again. We’re famous amongst other fans for bottling it, for falling apart. So many chances and opportunities wasted, but it’s not been the same group of players over the past 16 years. The one common denominator has been us, the fans.

Elland Road can be a ferociously loud place at times, there is little to rival Leeds United supporters on their day. But we can be an anxious bunch. The expectations of a team like Leeds United, the weight of our history and fifteen years of us watching our team fail. Is it all a bit too much sometimes? Both against Wigan and Derby at home last year you could feel the tension in the ground, the anxiety of the fans when things started going against us. Surely that must transfer onto the pitch to the players? As much as we would have loved to watch our team romp home to victory, to lift the cup, was it perhaps better that we weren’t there at all?

View all Showing latest five comments of seven...

Leeds1000 wrote on 28 Jul 2020 09:11 am

andrewjohnsmith wrote:
Mon Jul 27, 2020 6:26 pm
The break probably hurt us more than anything. Promotion looked a certainty when the break happened. Then a couple of games after the restart, we'd drawn at home to Luton and Brentford were right on our tails. I think it was a neutral reset for everyone. But, I believe, if the break hadn't happened we'd have clinched promotion sooner (obviously by the calendar but also in terms of games played).

The only thing I think it did change is that a few teams with nothing to play for probably came back with a "why the hell are we doing this" attitude. Some players didn't extend their contract. But without going into micro-detail, that probably affected everyone evenly.
Obviously we will never know but i see it like AJ. If anything coming back after the break disrupted our rhythm and made us nervy for the first few games. Brentford came out of the blocks firing and narrowed the gap. So hindered for me.

1964white wrote on 28 Jul 2020 06:30 am

Difficult to assess as we were on a fantastic run prior lockdown, a little hiccup v Cardiff & Luton then we recovered our form & confidence once again winning our last six games

mav wrote on 27 Jul 2020 07:04 pm

It's hard to suggest it hindered us in hindsight, but the teams that didn't play proper football (Cardiff etc) have benefitted from the drinks breaks a great deal.

SG90 wrote on 27 Jul 2020 06:35 pm

We won 5 in a row before lockdown, so it's not like it changed our form. Brentford were in bad form before the lockdown, as were West Brom, no one was ever realistically going to catch us.

andrewjohnsmith wrote on 27 Jul 2020 06:26 pm

The break probably hurt us more than anything. Promotion looked a certainty when the break happened. Then a couple of games after the restart, we'd drawn at home to Luton and Brentford were right on our tails. I think it was a neutral reset for everyone. But, I believe, if the break hadn't happened we'd have clinched promotion sooner (obviously by the calendar but also in terms of games played).

The only thing I think it did change is that a few teams with nothing to play for probably came back with a "why the hell are we doing this" attitude. Some players didn't extend their contract. But without going into micro-detail, that probably affected everyone evenly.