Council raise 'significant concerns' over the club’s travel plans

23 Oct 2025 07:41 am, by Ellandback1


Good Morning. It's Thursday 23rd October, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road...


Elland Road expansion: Fans left frustrated as bureaucracy threatens progress

It’s hard not to feel a burning sense of frustration over the latest developments surrounding the Elland Road expansion plans. We’ve waited years, decades even, for real progress on bringing our historic home into the modern era, and now it feels like bureaucracy could derail the entire project for yet another season.

The council’s planning process, which was supposed to take around 13 weeks, has already stretched to 20, and fears are growing that construction might not even begin until after another full campaign. For a club that has fought its way back to stability both on and off the pitch, the thought of more red tape and delays is unsettling.

The main sticking point, as always, seems to be transport. Leeds City Council’s latest report has flagged “significant concerns” over the club’s Travel Plan, with requests for revised frameworks and additional data. Of course, traffic and congestion are real issues-anyone who’s been to Elland Road on matchday knows that.

It feels like the club is being asked to jump through endless hoops. Active Travel England and National Highways have both lodged objections, and while Leeds United have been cooperating and updating their submissions, we’re still stuck in the mire of consultation and paperwork. Meanwhile, the clock is ticking, and the longer this drags on, the more likely it becomes that the start date will slip well beyond May 2026.

What makes this harder to swallow is that the club clearly recognises the challenges and is actively addressing them. The goal of reducing car use, improving public transport links, and ensuring a safer matchday experience is being taken seriously. But progress requires momentum, and right now, it feels like there’s too much hesitation from decision-makers.

Elland Road at 53,000 capacity would be a symbol of how far we’ve come, a stadium worthy of our ambitions. Yet, instead of forward movement, we’re trapped in a cycle of reports, deferrals, and missed deadlines. It’s time for the council to match the club’s urgency and ambition. Leeds United are ready to invest, ready to build, and ready to elevate Elland Road into the 21st century!





Alarming DCL stats that will unnerve Whites fans

If scoring goals were judged on effort alone, Leeds United would be title contenders by now. The 1-0 loss to Burnley wasn’t just another dent in Leeds survival hopes; it was the fourth time in eight matches that Daniel Farke’s men have failed to score. That’s despite producing an expected goals (xG) figure of 2.63 at Turf Moor, proof, if ever needed that creating chances and burying that don't go hand in hand.

At the centre of the storm is Dominic Calvert-Lewin, the man tasked with leading the line and, theoretically scoring the goals. He’s managed the first part convincingly; he does lead the line, but the second has become something of a disappearing act. He has managed just 22 touches in the opposition box this term, over 449 minutes of game time, less than five touches per 90 minutes!!!

According to the data gods, since the start of the season, Calvert-Lewin has underperformed his xG by a staggering 10.4. To put that into plain English, he should have scored ten more goals than he actually has, putting him in last place. Next is Nicolas Jackson with 7, followed by Beto (6.2), Darwin Nunez (6.1) and Keane Lewis-Potter (5.5). It's a bitter pill to swollow considering DCL's £120,000 per week (that's over half a million a month) salary.




View all Showing latest 5 comments of 25...

DDB220 wrote on 24 Oct 2025 06:19 pm

BlackHillsPaul wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:14 pm If there is just ONE area of experience and expertise that I recognize in the 49ers organization, it's in getting a stadium project done. They built a brand new NFL stadium for the Niners in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. Known to most of you as Silicon Valley. Some of the most expensive and heavily regulated land in the world. An EXTREMELY difficult political environment. It's hard for me to imagine the Elland Road project being more difficult than that. But if it is, we have the right people in place to get it done!
I can assure you planning regulations in the U.K. are a minefield with a huge list of stakeholders to keep happy. A new stadium is still a realistic outcome for me because when I look at the geography of the existing location, particularly when considering the ambition of the upgrade it is a huge ask. This could rumble on and on.

AcrossThePondAsh wrote on 23 Oct 2025 09:55 pm

The Subhuman wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 7:58 am If xG had any meaning, I'd be worried.. But it's just a stat that fails to take virtually anything important into consideration. It also assumes every player/team is of identical quality
This is not intended to start up the ole Hatfield/McCoy xG feud, so please take it with a grain of salt (this might be mainly for the angry swan--after seeing the image Cjay posted of her demolishing that sign she's definitely not one to be trifled with :lol: ).

I've never understand the visceral aversion to xG--to me seems like it's actual built to show the difference between the chances created and the finishing quality that follows. It doesn’t claim to measure ability directly; it isolates shot quality so you can see which sides are over- or under-performing the chances they produce.

For example, when two teams post similar xG numbers but one keeps scoring more, doesn't the gap say something about finishing, defending, or goalkeeping, not about the stat itself? And the model’s not blind to context--seems quite the opposite actually: distance, angle, assist type, defensive pressure, body part, and keeper positioning are all part of the equation.

Just my opinion, but it seems like ignoring xG altogether is a bit like judging a striker’s season by the # of goals alone—it leaves out the context that explains why those goals came. I think it just gets a bad rap because too many use it as a blunt instrument rather than a diagnostic tool—fans, pundits, and of course, Jesse Marsch :) Never mind, just answered my own question--pretty sure that last might be all we need to explain everyone's' aversion to xG.

Barlow Boy wrote on 23 Oct 2025 08:45 pm

CUSSIE01 wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 7:51 pm How long does it usually take to sober up ?
Longer than it takes to exit a multi storey car park 🤣

CUSSIE01 wrote on 23 Oct 2025 07:51 pm

Barlow Boy wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:46 pm It’s a mammoth project, can you imagine trying to exit a multi storey car park on match day. I’ve heard it can take over 30 minutes to exit the Peacock car park.

As I say, I get there at least 3 hours before kick off so parking is easy, but it can take me a while to get away after a game.
How long does it usually take to sober up ?

Barlow Boy wrote on 23 Oct 2025 06:46 pm

YorkshireSquare wrote: Thu Oct 23, 2025 6:08 pm The area master plan has buidings on every car park with the possibility of a multi-story on the cornve of Lowfields Road and Elland Road. The tram connection would seem to be a must to satisfy matchday demand, because the buses in Leeds are awful.
It’s a mammoth project, can you imagine trying to exit a multi storey car park on match day. I’ve heard it can take over 30 minutes to exit the Peacock car park.

As I say, I get there at least 3 hours before kick off so parking is easy, but it can take me a while to get away after a game.