How did Manchester City manage to earn £600m more than their rivals?

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Post Reply
User avatar
Smudge3920
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:08 pm
Location: Canada

How did Manchester City manage to earn £600m more than their rivals?

Post by Smudge3920 »

Manchester City have been reliant on entities based in owner Sheik Mansour's home country of the UAE for sponsorship deals that have allowed them to outspend most of their rivals on transfer fees and wages in the past decade.
At the start of the 2020-21 season they had a squad that had cost €1.063billion (£974million) in transfer fees — the most expensive in global football. And their wage bill in a pandemic-hit 2019-20 season, when most clubs were cutting costs, was £351.4m, the highest one-season total in the history of English football.
The Mail on Sunday's analysis has compared City's commercial income with three Premier League clubs with similar traits: Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal, who all have 'Big Six' status, regular Champions League football over the past decade, large fanbases, and a history of success.
In the 10 years to the end of 2020, City earned £1.7bn in commercial income. In the same period, Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal averaged £1.1bn each, meaning City earned £600m more from commercial deals than those other clubs of similar size and status. The difference with City's commercial earnings is that — unlike any of the other three — they are hugely reliant on sponsors in one territory, the UAE.
In the 2012-13 season, for example, City's commercial revenues leapt 33 per cent in a year to £143m, and UAE-based companies accounted for 83 per cent of the total, with £67.5m from Etihad, £15m from investment firm Aabar, £16.5m from telecoms company Etisalat and £19.75m from the Abu Dhabi Tourism authority.
By 2015-16, it is understood six separate UAE entities and partners contributed £122m in sponsorship to City's coffers, of £179m, for 68 per cent of the total. And by 2019-20, the figure was about £140m of £250m for a ratio of 56 per cent.
This potentially becomes a problem for City if it is conclusively proved that chunks of money apparently being paid as sponsorship by 'arms length' third parties was or is in fact ultimately being funded by City's owner or parties related to him, and not by the bodies claimed.

Source Daily Mail...
........................
And what will be done about it?...that is IF the will and determination to level the playing field is there...
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 8185
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire

Re: How did Manchester City manage to earn £600m more than their rivals?

Post by weasel »

Smudge3920 wrote: Sun Jul 25, 2021 4:18 am ........................
And what will be done about it?...that is IF the will and determination to level the playing field is there...
I don't see the problem with owners pumping the money in. The problem is with owners who aren't rich enough to do this but then pay themselves, and family and friends, fortunes despite the club losing money and end up making a fortune out of a club despite plunging it into administration etc.
Senor El Weasel
User avatar
Smudge3920
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:08 pm
Location: Canada

Re: How did Manchester City manage to earn £600m more than their rivals?

Post by Smudge3920 »

weasel wrote: Sun Jul 25, 2021 11:47 am I don't see the problem with owners pumping the money in. The problem is with owners who aren't rich enough to do this but then pay themselves, and family and friends, fortunes despite the club losing money and end up making a fortune out of a club despite plunging it into administration etc.
You dont see the inequity in this?... And what is the point of FFP then?... allowing this to go on is just allowing Citeh to buy the prem title. It is not competition. And it is not just the owners, it is other oil rich members of the family sponsoring the club...legal maybe , but tardy and underhand definately.
Post Reply