The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11202
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Breakfast Debate The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Ellandback1 »



Good Morning. It's Wednesday 5th November, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road...


No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in NYT strongest LUFC XI

When asked to name his strongest Leeds United starting XI, assuming every player was fully fit and in form, New York Times chief correspondent Beren Cross focused his attention on the positions that invite the most debate. In goal, Lucas Perri remains something of an unknown quantity, with too few appearances to draw firm conclusions. Nevertheless, if manager Daniel Farke has installed him as first choice, Cross is inclined to trust that judgement for now. Central defence brings similar uncertainty. While Joe Rodon’s presence is unquestioned, the identity of his partner raises discussion. Jaka Bijol has yet to be fully tested in Leeds colours, but given his Serie A pedigree and the significant investment made over the summer, Cross suspects he would start ahead of Pascal Struijk.

Midfield presents perhaps the most compelling storyline. Sean Longstaff, initially the fourth-choice option behind Anton Stach and Ao Tanaka, has seized his opportunity with performances full of energy and intelligence. His set-piece delivery has been a pleasant surprise, but he also excels in defensive and transitional work. Stach enjoyed a blistering pre-season, dominating in a friendly against Milan and impressing in early league fixtures, yet his form has faded, but that could be because of injury. Tanaka, meanwhile, has been sidelined for much of the campaign, though he returned with a sparkling display in the opening win over Everton. Cross notes that team selection here could hinge on match context: Stach offers physical resilience, particularly useful away from home, while Tanaka’s creativity suits games where Leeds expect to dominate the ball. If pressed, the German might edge the final place.

In attack, injuries have prevented a clear hierarchy among Daniel James, Noah Okafor, and Wilfried Gnonto. Okafor has shown a knack for beating defenders and finishing, while Gnonto possesses similar qualities based on his earlier Premier League bursts. The challenge lies in positional balance — if Okafor starts on the left, can Gnonto adapt to the right? James, a key figure last season, has struggled to recapture form since an injury in April. Leeds will hope he can rediscover his sharpness.

Ultimately, Cross’s strongest Leeds XI in a 4-3-3 formation would be: Perri; Bogle, Rodon, Bijol, Gudmundsson; Longstaff, Ampadu, Stach; James, Calvert-Lewin, Okafor; a blend of steel, creativity, and pace, chosen with careful consideration of form, fitness, and tactical needs.





January signings unlikely

Leeds United’s approach to the upcoming January transfer window appears to be one of caution and calculated decision-making, a stance reaffirmed by managing director Robbie Evans in discussions following the summer transfer window. Evans highlighted the club’s preference to avoid mid-season spending sprees, stressing their long-standing strategy of completing key business before the season starts.

“Whether it’s in the summer window, the free-agent market or January, it’s all about what the team actually needs,” he explained, noting the importance of weighing opportunity costs, both in terms of future purchases that might be blocked and sales that could be forced from the current squad. For Leeds, January is traditionally a time to assess rather than overhaul, but Evans made it abundantly clear that Leeds drained their accounts during the summer.

With only six months left on his contract, Welsh international Harry Wilson represents a tempting option, particularly given Leeds’ desperate need for both creativity and a set-piece taker. Beren Cross of The New York Times recently addressed the likelihood of winter reinforcements, suggesting that while Leeds will undoubtedly be monitoring opportunities, they will need strong justification before making a move.

The question is not just about Wilson’s availability, but whether his signing would directly address a gap in the squad in a manner that justifies breaking the club’s usual January restraints. Last winter and the one before passed without major Leeds signings, reflecting both caution and confidence in the squad. Yet football is unpredictable; injuries, dips in form, or tactical adjustments means the door to January business can never be entirely closed.

Last time around, when Leeds were relegated, it was abundantly clear that the club had not prepared for relegation and paid the price! This time around, the club are in a much more stable position to bounce back up again should the unthinkable happen. This could be another reason why a January spurge in the transfer market is unlikely!


User avatar
Chilli D
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 7896
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Chilli D »

Having watch some championship games recently, we should go for Watford's Imran Louza in January.
I watched their game against Ipswich last night and he was the best player on the pitch by a country mile.
I'm convinced he is good enough to play PL. A playmaker with an eye for goal.
The flowers of common sense do not grow in everyone's garden
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69881
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by The Subhuman »

Well that's a depressing morning debate.. Poor "best" first 11 and no one coming in...
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69881
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by The Subhuman »

Chilli D wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 9:59 am Having watch some championship games recently, we should go for Watford's Imran Louza in January.
I watched their game against Ipswich last night and he was the best player on the pitch by a country mile.
I'm convinced he is good enough to play PL. A playmaker with an eye for goal.
I watched that, good game with a lot of quality. Philogene excellent too
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
ruttermania
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:47 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by ruttermania »

I think it's clear that if he's fit and firing that James gets in ahead of Aaronson and the question then becomes whether he can make a difference in terms of getting goals off some of the DCL knockdowns . It seemed to me that against West Ham that there were particularly in the second half a number of long balls forward where DCL was having some joy in getting possession but there wasn't enough support coming through to profit from that . Did they not play the long ball against Brighton because their defence had him sewn up ?If we are competitive by the time the Transfer Window opens would some of our summer transfer targets reconsider on the assumption that their rejection of Leeds was based on the lazy assumption much propounded by 'Pundits' that there was no hope for the newly promoted sides . If that was the case would the 49ers not take a punt particularly if the return of Gnonto and James doesn't prompt an uptick in goalscoring and Okafor continues to miss sizeable chunks of playing time. Given that such an acquisition would probably necessitate the sale of one of our PSR assets before July ( Struijk , Gnonto ?) it's going to be a fairly fine calculation but it probably has a higher percentage chance of keeping us up than any other decision they might make no matter what the Farke haters think.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11202
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Ellandback1 »

The Subhuman wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 10:10 am Well that's a depressing morning debate.. Poor "best" first 11 and no one coming in...
Well said,

I for one think we need Aaronson's energy on top of Stach, Amps and Longstaff. In order to compete, we need more strength in midfield, and I think Longstaff and Aaronson compliment each other at both ends of the field. Aaronson is not a No 10, and certainly not a right winger, despite how the formation line him up - he's a box to box midfielder, and quite frankly getting better every game.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11202
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Ellandback1 »

If another team were to offer 18m for Tanaka, I'd snap theirs hands off.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69881
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by The Subhuman »

I'd sell Longstaff if we're looking to get funds. Don't think anyone else would have him though..
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69881
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by The Subhuman »

This is not great due to the inept transfer window but our best 11 atm is

Perri
Bogle
Gudmundsson
Ampadu
Rodon
Struijk
Gnonto
Stach
Piroe
Tanaka
Okafor
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69881
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by The Subhuman »

There's a great peice on a Raider site called "Rebuilding the treadmill of sub-mediocrity" it applies to the Raiders but it also applied to Leeds under the Niners (finance group)

Adding mediocre quality
Spending big (for us) on positions already occupied by quality while leaving the same positional issues we had
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
ruttermania
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2023 9:47 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by ruttermania »

Basically with the replacement of Gruev by Ampadu and James by Okafor neither of which changes the dynamic that is the side that was walloped by Arsenal . I'm not sure what people expected from this season but I was resigned from the outset to a tough and gruelling battle to eke out enough points to stay in the league. Apart from the Burnley result I cannot say that any of the match outcomes were unexpected albeit it would have been better to avoid shipping so many goals against Arsenal and Brighton. Selling Longstaff reduces your options in terms of a battling combative midfield which is going to be vital in terms of keeping us competitive in games against clubs that have used their years in the Prem to build bigger squads with a higher threshold . Selling Tanaka reduces your capacity to change up the midfield for more attacking edge particularly in home games and neither of those sales has a huge PSR impact unless you get big money for Tanaka .
User avatar
Sean_Nile
Manager
Manager
Posts: 4592
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2023 2:25 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Sean_Nile »

Leeds United’s January transfer strategy, should be dictated to a DEI strategy, and we should seek out a winger from a postcode under 50,000 souls who identifies as non-binary.

This attacker will deliver intersectional width that boosts vegan-assisted goals by 37 % and caps wages a one pound below the men’s median to close historic gender gaps in wages.

In midfield, the creative void demands a time-fluid playmaker who embraces neurodiversity and arrives in the box when the vibes are right.

A therapy llama should be available to anyone who plays in the midfield and has to be present at half time during away games for comfort and consolation. This midfield attacker should be blessed with ADHD-driven chaos, and be completely erratic and unpredictable as a playmaker.

Defensively, the club should seek an eco-conscious full-back who cycles to training, refuses plastic shin pads, and overlaps only during odd minutes on the clock to cut down on his carbon emissions.

The team will wear eco friendly bamboo-kits, and their boots will be forged from recycled 1992–93 away shirts. The squad by their style of play will cut squad CO₂ by 14 %, and in the interests of equality each player will have their shirt adorned with their preferred pronouns.

This is the recipe for success
He's C. Nile and he writes what he wants
Never let good taste stand in the way of style
User avatar
Chilli D
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 7896
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Chilli D »

The Subhuman wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 10:20 am I watched that, good game with a lot of quality. Philogene excellent too
I was shocked when they took Philogene off with still quite a lot of the second half left
The flowers of common sense do not grow in everyone's garden
User avatar
Pullhard
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 2073
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Pullhard »

Our strongest 11 is largely academic and possibly irrelevant.
Are we playing home or away, player form, formation and tactical approach should have a significant influence on the strongest 11 for any particular game.
Jammy 07
Manager
Manager
Posts: 2929
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 10:09 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Jammy 07 »

Any purchases in January would not be assessed for P&S rules until at least 30th June 2025. Therefore any points deductions etc could not be applied until next season at the earliest.

That's the way I see it anyway and of course there is always the option to sell a player(s) after the season finishes but before 30th June.
DDB220
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 6380
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by DDB220 »

For me a fit and sharp Willy Gnonto gets on the team sheet before any other winger we have currently at the club. Far better technically, two footed and stronger in possession.

The ability of James ostensibly relies on his pace. At championship level it is a potent weapon at prem level not so much as he is facing defenders with similar pace who are stronger and have a higher level technical quality. DJ is for me best used against tiring defenders as a sub at this level.

His last season in the prem on loan at Fulham pretty much confirms that assessment.
DDB220
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 6380
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by DDB220 »

Jammy 07 wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 1:22 pm Any purchases in January would not be assessed for P&S rules until at least 30th June 2025. Therefore any points deductions etc could not be applied until next season at the earliest.

That's the way I see it anyway and of course there is always the option to sell a player(s) after the season finishes but before 30th June.
I believe they have tightened up such expenditure loopholes. But there is always wriggle room for clever accountants. For example like Chelsea - We could sell the ladies team to a holding company for a fair few million over the evaluation.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11202
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Ellandback1 »

DDB220 wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 4:33 pm I believe they have tightened up such expenditure loopholes. But there is always wriggle room for clever accountants. For example like Chelsea - We could sell the ladies team to a holding company for a fair few million over the evaluation.
The Leeds ladies team have no official affiliation with LUFC anymore since Cellino
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 36548
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by Cjay »

DDB220 wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 4:33 pm I believe they have tightened up such expenditure loopholes. But there is always wriggle room for clever accountants. For example like Chelsea - We could sell the ladies team to a holding company for a fair few million over the evaluation.
Always ways round it

Our owners never try and these have no intention of either.

Was all in that "leaked" plan in the summer, they will sell academy players for the profit.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
pjm2019
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 2093
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2021 5:12 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Wednesday 5th November) No space for Aaronsson or Gnonto in strongest LUFC XI

Post by pjm2019 »

ruttermania wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 12:16 pm Basically with the replacement of Gruev by Ampadu and James by Okafor neither of which changes the dynamic that is the side that was walloped by Arsenal . I'm not sure what people expected from this season but I was resigned from the outset to a tough and gruelling battle to eke out enough points to stay in the league. Apart from the Burnley result I cannot say that any of the match outcomes were unexpected albeit it would have been better to avoid shipping so many goals against Arsenal and Brighton. Selling Longstaff reduces your options in terms of a battling combative midfield which is going to be vital in terms of keeping us competitive in games against clubs that have used their years in the Prem to build bigger squads with a higher threshold . Selling Tanaka reduces your capacity to change up the midfield for more attacking edge particularly in home games and neither of those sales has a huge PSR impact unless you get big money for Tanaka .
we should only sell if we can bring in better places in Jan. IF players are available are we able to sell any of the players out on loan. Gruev is the only squad that would could sell who is surplus
Leeds are staying Up Staying Up - OR ARE WE unlikely unless we replace DF asap
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], BlackHillsPaul, Semrush [Bot] and 568 guests