The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11142
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Breakfast Debate The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Ellandback1 »



Good Morning. It's Monday 1st December, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road...


Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Phil Foden's injury time winner kept Manchester City in the Premier League title race, at the expense of Leeds Utd, having mounted a courageous second half fightback. The England international struck twice, including a stoppage-time winner, to spare City’s blushes after they nearly threw away a comfortable two-goal lead. Foden opened the scoring inside the first minute, calmly slotting home from Matheus Nunes’ cross, before Josko Gvardiol doubled the advantage midway through the first half. At that stage, Leeds looked completely out of their depth, struggling at times to keep their shape. Shot-stopper Lucas Perri kept the score respectable with some sharp saves, though he fumed over Gvardiol’s goal, claiming obstruction.

Things changed after the break when Daniel Farke rolled the dice, switching to a 3-5-2 formation and introducing Dominic Calvert-Lewin. The striker immediately breathed life into the visitors, poking in from close range before winning a penalty that Lukas Nmecha eventually converted, albeit at the second attempt after his initial effort was poorly struck. Suddenly, Leeds had belief, and City’s frustration grew as they failed to put the game to bed. Erling Haaland was left waiting for his 100th Premier League goal, but Foden stepped up in the dying moments, showing composure under pressure to rifle home the decisive third.

While the final scoreline suggests a close contest, City could and probably should have wrapped things up in the first half, with missed chances keeping Leeds in the game. The penalty they conceded was clumsy, but Nmecha’s finish was fortunate, rebounding kindly straight back to him. In the end, Foden’s brilliance proved the difference, masking an unconvincing second-half display from City. Leeds can take heart from their spirited fightback, even if it came too late to avoid yet another defeat but will it be enough to keep Daniel Farke in a job?





Credit where its due

Leeds fans aren’t exactly used to talking about Daniel Farke winning a tactical battle, especially mid-game, but the second half against Manchester City at the weekend has at least given them reason to pause. Criticism of Farke’s in-game management has been growing, particularly his reluctance to make bold, proactive changes when things aren’t working. This time, however, he tore up the script. After a first half that went as most expected – his side pinned back in the customary 4-3-3 and struggling to lay a glove on City – Farke used the break to switch to a 5-3-2. Suddenly, Lukas Nmecha had the support of a rejuvenated Dominic Calvert-Lewin
Erling Haaland was seeing more defenders than he could handle, and Leeds were pushing up with far more impetus.

The difference was stark; City looked uncomfortable, Leeds looked alive, the cogs were once again turning in unison!!! Sure, Phil Foden’s strike settled the contest, but the narrative was no longer of Leeds being steamrolled. Whether this was a flash of tactical inspiration or a fortunate punt that paid off is up for debate, but what’s clear is that it worked, and perhaps offers more optimism than the result alone suggests ahead of Chelsea midweek. Farke may not have “outsmarted” Pep Guardiola for the full 90, but for once, he asked questions City couldn’t immediately answer, and that’s worth a nod.





Premier League sack race re-opens

Leeds United may have slumped to their fourth consecutive defeat at the weekend, but for once there was a flicker of light at the end of the tunnel. Only a week ago, the Whites were plummeting towards the Championship trap door at full speed, with little sign of control. On Saturday, however, Daniel Farke seemed to at least identify where the brakes are located! The performance, while still not enough to secure any points, showed more fight, structure and intent than in recent times, perhaps enough to stop the freefall and buy the German boss a little breathing room.

That slight improvement hasn’t escaped the attention of the bookmakers, who have now reshuffled the odds in the Premier League sack race. Farke still leads the unflattering pack as 1/2 favourite to be the next manager shown the door, but there’s a sense that his fate isn’t entirely sealed if Leeds can build on this display. Thomas Frank sits at 4/1, with Arne Slot at 8/1, while Scott Parker and Marco Silva share 12/1. For Leeds fans, Saturday wasn’t the turnaround they craved, but it might just be the first step towards slowing the runaway train down.


User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 145521
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by 1964white »

We have conceded six goals in added-on-time.

Ten goals in the last twenty minutes.
WhiteRose
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3224
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2019 12:24 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by WhiteRose »

1964white wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 8:11 am We have conceded six goals in added-on-time.

Ten goals in the last twenty minutes.
Just seems to be a loss of concentration, which is probably fitness related. Foden allowed to wander around in the 18 yard box unmarked on the 91st minute - DCL looks at him but doesn’t bother to move towards him
User avatar
Tyzy
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3452
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:09 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Tyzy »

WhiteRose wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:22 am Just seems to be a loss of concentration, which is probably fitness related. Foden allowed to wander around in the 18 yard box unmarked on the 91st minute - DCL looks at him but doesn’t bother to move towards him
I noticed that when I watched the highlights DCL just gave Foden all the space he needed.We need to realise we are in the Prem and quality players don't need much of an opportunity to score,we however do.
Last edited by Tyzy on Mon Dec 01, 2025 11:31 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Clitheroe White
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1358
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:38 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Clitheroe White »

Long reflection after the match on Saturday. Before the match I expected a drubbing, and we got off lightly in the end due to a very good half time change of approach (well done DF).

Before the match I was firmly in the mindset of new manager time. Post match I was swayed into more neutral ground that this could get better with DF in charge.

Yesterday I reflected on past relationships where you know it's only going one way, and then they do something to surprise you and you think, maybe I should stay with them. Then a few weeks later they revert back to their normal baseline and the relationship eventually ends.

On balance, I still think this is going one way and we are putting off the inevitable. Therefore the sooner the better.

Wins against Chelsea and Liverpool would change my mind though :-). Next week could be an interesting week.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69409
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by The Subhuman »

Tyzy wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 11:26 am I noticed that when I watched the highlights DCL just gave Foden all the space he needed.We need to realise we are in the Prem and quality players don't need much of an opportunity to score
Bijol is also pathetic as the closest to get a block in... should have
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69409
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by The Subhuman »

I still haven't called for Farke's head.... Unless there's a clear path to more than a makeshift replacement, he stays for me. No point sacking for sacking sake
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
Irish Ian
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 15836
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:53 pm
Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Irish Ian »

WhiteRose wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:22 am Just seems to be a loss of concentration, which is probably fitness related. Foden allowed to wander around in the 18 yard box unmarked on the 91st minute - DCL looks at him but doesn’t bother to move towards him
That's what happens when you double or sometimes treble up in Haaland, it leaves room for others, there is no need to apportion blame on the team for their winner, Citeh just have quality everywhere.
'
"Football is about the people and the players,” he said. “Then there are those who will mingle in the middle: the coaches, executives and journalists. That last group represents the worst part about football" Marcelo Bielsa
User avatar
Orange Box
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 5892
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Orange Box »

WhiteRose wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:22 am Just seems to be a loss of concentration, which is probably fitness related. Foden allowed to wander around in the 18 yard box unmarked on the 91st minute - DCL looks at him but doesn’t bother to move towards him
I used to watch the LUTV videos of the team training, but stopped recently because they were always the same - tight passing triangles and short burst routines.

I understand we won’t be privy to tactical training, but we never see the team doing stamina work - maybe it’s not exciting enough to broadcast, I don’t know.

But that statistic of late goals against is very disturbing.
Please don't ever make the mistake of taking me seriously.
User avatar
Orange Box
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 5892
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Orange Box »

Tyzy wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 11:26 am I noticed that when I watched the highlights DCL just gave Foden all the space he needed.We need to realise we are in the Prem and quality players don't need much of an opportunity to score,we however do.
DCL was brought in BECAUSE he is a Prem level player, so tracking back shouldn’t be a learning point for him.
Please don't ever make the mistake of taking me seriously.
Jammy 07
Manager
Manager
Posts: 2882
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 10:09 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Jammy 07 »

Has anyone notice we finished the weekend better off than before it ?

We'd surely have all taken that given we were playing City away :)
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11142
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Ellandback1 »

Orange Box wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 12:19 pm I used to watch the LUTV videos of the team training, but stopped recently because they were always the same - tight passing triangles and short burst routines.

I understand we won’t be privy to tactical training, but we never see the team doing stamina work - maybe it’s not exciting enough to broadcast, I don’t know.

But that statistic of late goals against is very disturbing.
They have tactical training??? :shock:
User avatar
Pullhard
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 1972
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Pullhard »

WhiteRose wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:22 am Just seems to be a loss of concentration, which is probably fitness related. Foden allowed to wander around in the 18 yard box unmarked on the 91st minute - DCL looks at him but doesn’t bother to move towards him
We seem to play very high intensity for the first half which starts to drop off as the game progresses and fatigue becomes a factor.
Could be a issue in the volume of late goals conceded.
That of course signals the need for earlier subs.
User avatar
Orange Box
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 5892
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Orange Box »

Ellandback1 wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 5:38 pm They have tactical training??? :shock:
It’s an assumption…
Please don't ever make the mistake of taking me seriously.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 145521
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by 1964white »

Pullhard wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 6:10 pm We seem to play very high intensity for the first half which starts to drop off as the game progresses and fatigue becomes a factor.
Could be a issue in the volume of late goals conceded.
That of course signals the need for earlier subs.
Our subs/bench is weaker than the majority of the other clubs.
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 145521
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by 1964white »

WhiteRose wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 9:22 am Just seems to be a loss of concentration, which is probably fitness related. Foden allowed to wander around in the 18 yard box unmarked on the 91st minute - DCL looks at him but doesn’t bother to move towards him
Easy target is DCL to criticise who is not a defender, Ampadu & Tanaka who were in front of Foden, could be apportioned more of the blame!

I put that winner down as a quality finish from a quality footballer, hardly any back lift with his shot, just great balance & vision!

Back to DCL, he made one defensive header from a Citeh set-piece, which probably went unnoticed.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11142
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Ellandback1 »

GUYS, MASSIVE RUMOUR ITS GARY O'NEILL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11142
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Ellandback1 »

Gary O'Neill's odds have just tumbled from 12/1 to 11/8 favourite
User avatar
Madron
Manager
Manager
Posts: 2697
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:46 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by Madron »

1964white wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 7:06 pm Our subs/bench is weaker than the majority of the other clubs.
Not sure its weaker than our relegation rivals, which is what matters.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 69409
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Monday 1st December) Second half fightback thwarted by injury time winner

Post by The Subhuman »

1964white wrote: Mon Dec 01, 2025 7:42 pm Easy target is DCL to criticise who is not a defender, Ampadu & Tanaka who were in front of Foden, could be apportioned more of the blame!

I put that winner down as a quality finish from a quality footballer, hardly any back lift with his shot, just great balance & vision!

Back to DCL, he made one defensive header from a Citeh set-piece, which probably went unnoticed.
I mentioned it in game and added half a point to his score
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 1085 guests