Trump
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Re: Trump
Trump has the attitude and the policies we need here - riding in to office on a wave of belief and national pride. Instead we have a dour, disparaging, kow-towing coward and his bunch of miserables running the country further in to the ground. I only hope we see a similar personality to Trump arrive in the next few years and offer the same level of hope and pride to the British people.
-
- Reserve Player
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jul 27, 2023 4:40 pm
- Location: Wetherby
Re: Trump
It was a barn storming speech. Glad he is giving service folk who refused the Covid jab their jobs back with full back pay, gives a hint of what may have lay in wait for the evil Fauci were it not for Biden’s preemptive pardon.
Re: Trump
Just watched the Trump inauguration speech and it was a devastating condemnation of the Biden administration.WhiteRose wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 5:46 pm Trump has the attitude and the policies we need here - riding in to office on a wave of belief and national pride. Instead we have a dour, disparaging, kow-towing coward and his bunch of miserables running the country further in to the ground. I only hope we see a similar personality to Trump arrive in the next few years and offer the same level of hope and pride to the British people.
He went through all their failed policies and listed them one by one. There was standing ovations on almost every point and while the crowd stood and cheered, Joe and Kamala sat stone faced refusing to applaud.
It was almost like a show trial in China... from now on there is going to be two sexes male and female, who dares to say that? There will be no more DEI, people will be hired on merit... shock horror, and critical race theory will be abolished from schools.
He was saying things out loud that would have got you cancelled under the Biden administration.... censorship of free speech by online platforms gone.
The shocking revelation was America is going to Mars, and that made Elon jump for joy, and China will not be pleased they are loosing the Panama canal.
It was an eviceration of Biden, he was ground into the dust, brutally destroyed, not a single mention of his administration, or a word of praise. The main thrust of the speech was that he will revoke everything Biden did. No more green deal but it was going to be Drill baby drill.
He demolish all of the sacred cows beloved of the left... they should be afraid very afraid.
- mentalcase
- Moderator
- Posts: 9611
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:19 pm
Re: Trump
Exactly that WR, we get a lying rapist remoaner who goes back on his manifesto on day one, we need someone who is actually proud to be British and to put Britain first, stop giving money to abroad and stop the frigging rubber boats.WhiteRose wrote: ↑Mon Jan 20, 2025 5:46 pm Trump has the attitude and the policies we need here - riding in to office on a wave of belief and national pride. Instead we have a dour, disparaging, kow-towing coward and his bunch of miserables running the country further in to the ground. I only hope we see a similar personality to Trump arrive in the next few years and offer the same level of hope and pride to the British people.
Today we learnt lying starmer and his inept cronies have put back new hospitals desperately needed, one in Leeds will be put back till 2030, bloody disgraceful, not that LIEbour will be in power then.
" Man is not affected by events but by the view he takes of them "
- Barlow Boy
- Site Contributor
- Posts: 6881
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2023 9:32 pm
Re: Trump
Went on a bit that inauguration, his Mrs looked like she was going to a funeral.
Don’t cry because you said goodbye to your pet, smile because you said hello
Re: Trump
Preemptive pardons, where someone is pardoned before being
charged or convicted of a crime, are highly unusual and rare in legal
systems worldwide. While the U.S. has notable examples, such as
President Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon, most countries do
not have an explicit mechanism for preemptive pardons.
However, some legal systems do allow for broad discretionary powers
that might result in a similar outcome. It is strange that in the case of Faucci
the pardon is backdated to 2014 about the time he shipped gain of function
experiments abroad.
United States
The U.S. Constitution grants the president broad pardon powers,
which have been interpreted to include preemptive pardons.
Example: Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon, which pardoned
him for any crimes he might have committed as president, even
though no charges were brought against him. Biden has pardoned
his whole family, as well as the January 6th committee.
United Kingdom
The royal prerogative of mercy allows the monarch, on the advice
of government ministers, to issue pardons. Historically, this could
be used broadly, but it is now highly regulated and primarily applied
to cases of wrongful convictions, not preemptive pardons.
France
The French president has the constitutional power to grant clemency,
but it is usually exercised after a conviction. There are no established
mechanisms for preemptive pardons.
South Africa
The president has powers to grant pardons under the constitution,
but these are generally applied post-conviction. There’s no legal
precedent for preemptive pardons.
Other Countries
Many countries with systems of pardon or clemency tie these powers
to post-conviction cases. In authoritarian or semi-authoritarian regimes,
however, leaders might grant legal immunity or preemptive protection
as a political tool, but this is often extrajudicial rather than a formal "pardon."
In general, the idea of pardoning someone who hasn’t been charged
or convicted is highly controversial and viewed as contrary to the
principles of justice in most legal systems. The U.S. is one of the few
examples where this is explicitly allowed under the constitution.
And they say no-one is above the law... what a joke!!!
charged or convicted of a crime, are highly unusual and rare in legal
systems worldwide. While the U.S. has notable examples, such as
President Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon, most countries do
not have an explicit mechanism for preemptive pardons.
However, some legal systems do allow for broad discretionary powers
that might result in a similar outcome. It is strange that in the case of Faucci
the pardon is backdated to 2014 about the time he shipped gain of function
experiments abroad.
United States
The U.S. Constitution grants the president broad pardon powers,
which have been interpreted to include preemptive pardons.
Example: Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon, which pardoned
him for any crimes he might have committed as president, even
though no charges were brought against him. Biden has pardoned
his whole family, as well as the January 6th committee.
United Kingdom
The royal prerogative of mercy allows the monarch, on the advice
of government ministers, to issue pardons. Historically, this could
be used broadly, but it is now highly regulated and primarily applied
to cases of wrongful convictions, not preemptive pardons.
France
The French president has the constitutional power to grant clemency,
but it is usually exercised after a conviction. There are no established
mechanisms for preemptive pardons.
South Africa
The president has powers to grant pardons under the constitution,
but these are generally applied post-conviction. There’s no legal
precedent for preemptive pardons.
Other Countries
Many countries with systems of pardon or clemency tie these powers
to post-conviction cases. In authoritarian or semi-authoritarian regimes,
however, leaders might grant legal immunity or preemptive protection
as a political tool, but this is often extrajudicial rather than a formal "pardon."
In general, the idea of pardoning someone who hasn’t been charged
or convicted is highly controversial and viewed as contrary to the
principles of justice in most legal systems. The U.S. is one of the few
examples where this is explicitly allowed under the constitution.
And they say no-one is above the law... what a joke!!!
- Broad Ford
- Subs Bench
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2020 12:17 am
- Location: West Yorkshire
Re: Trump
As soon as I saw Musk raise his arm straight I thought ay up! Did he do it on purpose or is it the aspergers playing up? Either way it raised a few eyebrows.
On to Mars and travelling there could only take 45 days if NASA's Draco nuclear thermal rocket engine delivers without a hitch. Prepare the moon base as a launch pad then off they go to colonise a barren world, plant the stars and stripes and put America back on the map. Truly exciting times and no wonder Musk raises his arm aloft, but maybe next time he should keep his fingers curled tight to avoid people thinking that Von Brown and Adolf are behind the scenes again launching rockets into the upper atmosphere.
On to Mars and travelling there could only take 45 days if NASA's Draco nuclear thermal rocket engine delivers without a hitch. Prepare the moon base as a launch pad then off they go to colonise a barren world, plant the stars and stripes and put America back on the map. Truly exciting times and no wonder Musk raises his arm aloft, but maybe next time he should keep his fingers curled tight to avoid people thinking that Von Brown and Adolf are behind the scenes again launching rockets into the upper atmosphere.
If you don't know where you are going, every road will get you nowhere.
Re: Trump
Tax rises are not enough to fix this, the Spring budget will be hit hard by taxing even more, causing even more low growth and quite possibly a recession, until someone wakes up and realises it's not working.Broad Ford wrote: ↑Sun Jan 19, 2025 8:13 pm Glad you see that the banking, financial institutions are at the crux of Britains downfall. They put profits before the health of the nation and societal cohesion and their representatives in Westminster have no other choice than to serve banking profits.
When war brews we first see sanctions enforced upon the enemy and their finances, often leading to conflict based on fairytales of evil, rather than the bankers worries on the future of their own institutions. When large scale wars brew and industry gears up for war production then there are lots of jobs and wages for all to enjoy. How people that work in munitions factories celebrate Christmas and wish everybody a happy new year is hard to understand, but then if they greedily devour the fairytales fed them they somehow project their own shadows upon those they believe in error.
The banks are not the problem, the stupid people that are in Government are.
There are gilt bonds/investments, far too long to go into that here, but high yield = low trust from banks and foreign investors and the UK's yield right now is high rising because Rachel Reeves is totally out of her depth when she should be harder on deals.
A sensible idea is be to stop giving billions away in aid, vanity projects, and settle the national debt, if we are borrowing from banks at high interest rates, interest rates = inflation. Slow economy = low growth is quite simple, so a way out is to grow the economy with low interest rates and they need to be closer to Trump than ever to do this or they will get punished.
They need to protect the UK before any other nation, but they don't because they are globalists bowing to DAVOS and they hate the working class.
Another simple solution is to stop the supply and demand of illegal eco migrants, grow a spine and enforce a deterrent or this will totally cripple the economy. They are giving France millions and not 1 gang has been smashed and still they arrive every week draining the economy, the gangs can't be smashed, they'll just be replaced by others.
Labour are beyond useless.