Huddersfield charged by the FA

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Post Reply
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 128650
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by 1964white »

For breaching kit rules

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49293155
Top
User avatar
Ellandback1
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8884
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by Ellandback1 »

Leon, the kit was a hoax. Paddy Power did it for publicity.

They sponsor Huddersfield Town, but have not put their logo on their top at all.

They also want other betting companies to take their logo's off.
Top
User avatar
BGwhite
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 6571
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:02 am

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by BGwhite »

Betting companies should be banned outright from advertising in sport.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

Top
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 56299
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by The Subhuman »

Agreed
"Never debate an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and they have the advantage of experience"
Top
User avatar
Irish Ian
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 13263
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:53 pm
Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by Irish Ian »

BGwhite wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:01 am Betting companies should be banned outright.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Just my opinion.
'
"Football is about the people and the players,” he said. “Then there are those who will mingle in the middle: the coaches, executives and journalists. That last group represents the worst part about football" Marcelo Bielsa
Top
User avatar
BGwhite
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 6571
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:02 am

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by BGwhite »

Irish Ian wrote: Just my opinion.
Yep, and why not

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

Top
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 128650
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by 1964white »

Ellandback1 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 10:46 am Leon, the kit was a hoax. Paddy Power did it for publicity.

They sponsor Huddersfield Town, but have not put their logo on their top at all.

They also want other betting companies to take their logo's off.
As in the BBC link I posted Matt, they have reported the FA charge
Top
User avatar
whiteswan
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 15841
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 1:10 am

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by whiteswan »

BGwhite wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:01 am Betting companies should be banned outright from advertising in sport.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Totally agree with this BG
Top
gessa
Guest
Guest

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by gessa »

BGwhite wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 11:01 am Betting companies should be banned outright from advertising in sport.

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

They shpuld but I bet you a tenner they won't ;-)
Top
User avatar
Ellandback1
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 8884
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by Ellandback1 »

1964white wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:01 pm As in the BBC link I posted Matt, they have reported the FA charge
They wore the kit once as a joke in a pre season friendly.

That is what they are being reported for!!!
Top
User avatar
hector
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11849
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:57 am
Location: Salisbury

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by hector »

Ellandback1 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:45 pm They wore the kit once as a joke in a pre season friendly.

That is what they are being reported for!!!
Quite right too, fine them £200,000 for flouting the rules, and then deduct 25 points to deter anyone else, and then....

take them all outside put them up against the wall and shoot the bloody lot of them....!!

Most other clubs I would say over reaction, but the dog botherers?? :)
Top
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 128650
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by 1964white »

hector wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:04 pm Quite right too, fine them £200,000 for flouting the rules, and then deduct 25 points to deter anyone else, and then....

take them all outside put them up against the wall and shoot the bloody lot of them....!!

Most other clubs I would say over reaction, but the dog botherers?? :)
:rol: :rol: :rol:
Top
User avatar
Ratscoot
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3780
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 3:52 pm

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by Ratscoot »

1964white wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 10:42 am For breaching kit rules

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49293155
Can you imagine the outrage from the FA and EFL had it been us even as a one off pre season game joke :shock:
A bumble bee under the laws of physics shouldnt be able to fly, but it does because no one has told it that it can't
Top
User avatar
BGwhite
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 6571
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:02 am

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by BGwhite »

gessa wrote:
They shpuld but I bet you a tenner they won't ;-)
Im not a betting man but 20 and you're on !

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

Top
gessa
Guest
Guest

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by gessa »

BGwhite wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 2:09 pm Im not a betting man but 20 and you're on !

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Ok, 50 it is.
Top
User avatar
BGwhite
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 6571
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2018 11:02 am

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by BGwhite »

Double or quits ?

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

Top
User avatar
NorfolkWhite
Manager
Manager
Posts: 4912
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by NorfolkWhite »

hector wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 1:04 pm Quite right too, fine them £200,000 for flouting the rules, and then deduct 25 points to deter anyone else, and then....

take them all outside put them up against the wall and shoot the bloody lot of them....!!

Most other clubs I would say over reaction, but the dog botherers?? :)
Now if it were Leeds......
Top
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 16206
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by SG90 »

So how comes the 32Red Rooney deal is fine though?
Top
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 56299
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by The Subhuman »

Ellandback1 wrote: ↑Fri Aug 09, 2019 12:45 pm They wore the kit once as a joke in a pre season friendly.

That is what they are being reported for!!!
I don't get the joke..Can anybody explain?
"Never debate an idiot, they'll only drag you down to their level and they have the advantage of experience"
Top
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 128650
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Huddersfield charged by the FA

Post by 1964white »

Huddersfield Town have been fined a paltry £50,000 by the Football Association after wearing a kit in a friendly that breached advertising regulations.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Leeds United Chat”