JoeDenver wrote: ↑Sun Jan 29, 2023 3:31 am
First post (after introducing myself). I agree with others that at the beginning, the ref was very poor and perhaps a bit biased in favor of keeping the match tight for as long as possible. Thankfully no one got hurt from the ref’s lack of a whistle for that large period.
I’d rate him 2.5 until we scored the second goal and then a 6.5 for the remainder. What does that mean overall? How does a 4 sound?
It sounds like you were the ref and you don't have a clue.
Welcome Joe
"Critics are men that watch a battle from a high place, then come down and shoot the survivors"
