Bamford would be sorely disappointed cos you refuse to talk about him these daysfaaip wrote:Really? I'm happy to have them read mine..
Sent from my SM-T515 using Tapatalk
Bamford would be sorely disappointed cos you refuse to talk about him these daysfaaip wrote:Really? I'm happy to have them read mine..
Defo 64, and if they'd done this all season we would be in a LFC position now = out of sight.
hohoho that old chestnut has been roasted so many times it has become tedious.hector wrote:Aye you're right, but Barn Door Bambi couldn't score in a brothel...............
...but without bamford we would have conceded more, dominated less and created less chances to miss.White Riot wrote: ↑Sat Feb 29, 2020 5:30 am Defo 64, and if they'd done this all season we would be in a LFC position now = out of sight.
Very poor approach to the season to go with Bamford as your main striker and then have an option in Eddie and just not use him.
Bamford has caused the most damge to our promotion hopes this season.
Hopefully he proves us all wrong on the run in
Take your point Peter, that he's made a contribution to the team's success, but his actual finishing is absolutely woeful. Because we've no alternative and others are also missing chances every week is a nail-biter when we should be strolling through matches.Peter in Blackpool wrote: ↑Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:50 am ...but without bamford we would have conceded more, dominated less and created less chances to miss.
bamford is a very important player in the team
I don't think there's anyway you could make a case for that. The we concede more when he's off the pitch is a very misleading stat that I don't believe holds water for a second. Secondly there's absolutely no reason we wouldn't continue to create those chances...Peter in Blackpool wrote: ↑Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:50 am ...but without bamford we would have conceded more, dominated less and created less chances to miss.
bamford is a very important player in the team