Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.
Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Gray.......................Firpo
James - Rutter - Kamara - Summerville
..............Bamford
Every single one of them players could pin Sunderland in their own half, and win possession back high up the field if it is lost, and go again.
James - Rutter - Kamara - Summerville
..............Bamford
Every single one of them players could pin Sunderland in their own half, and win possession back high up the field if it is lost, and go again.
Not dependent on Google, the www or 'stats' - Just a guy that puts his eyes to full use on the beautiful game
;@)
;@)
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Not sure if there is another goalkeeper in the EFL who has as many touches and time in possession than Meslier
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Meant it in the most negative of ways
- weasel
- Superstar
- Posts: 14259
- Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
- Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
The main trouble for me against Sunderland was that we only had 2 potential scorers on the pitch, Summerville and James. Bamford as we know is a streaky striker, scores stuff like 7 in 9 matches but then goes the same amount of games without scoring. He is in one of his drought periods now. Rutter is simply abysmal in terms of a goal scoring threat. You can see he has little confidence and often passes up on opportunities to shoot, or when he does shoot the people sitting 20 rows back are in more danger than the opposition keeper. So we have 2 strikers carrying no goal threat and a central midfield with no goals this season and a back 4 that has 2 goals between the 4 of them (Ampadu's brace in the cup) unless you count Gray's pinball goal v Leicester.
For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.
I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.
It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.
I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.
It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
- mentalcase
- Moderator
- Posts: 7296
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:19 pm
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
You are correct, most of us have been saying the same thing for a long time though.weasel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:56 pm The main trouble for me against Sunderland was that we only had 2 potential scorers on the pitch, Summerville and James. Bamford as we know is a streaky striker, scores stuff like 7 in 9 matches but then goes the same amount of games without scoring. He is in one of his drought periods now. Rutter is simply abysmal in terms of a goal scoring threat. You can see he has little confidence and often passes up on opportunities to shoot, or when he does shoot the people sitting 20 rows back are in more danger than the opposition keeper. So we have 2 strikers carrying no goal threat and a central midfield with no goals this season and a back 4 that has 2 goals between the 4 of them (Ampadu's brace in the cup) unless you count Gray's pinball goal v Leicester.
For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.
I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.
It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
"Critics are men that watch a battle from a high place, then come down and shoot the survivors"
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Robert’s for Gray
Gray for Kamara
Gnonto for James
Probably enough changes to start
Half time bring on Joseph if our first half is like recent ones
Gray for Kamara
Gnonto for James
Probably enough changes to start
Half time bring on Joseph if our first half is like recent ones
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
The problem with taking Kamara out is that Firpo loses that defensive cover. Kamara has a great engine. Watch the Sunderland game after Kamara is subbed as proof of how his absence means Firpo drops deep. It is a big ask to flog Archie to fill that role. Unless you put Byram in. Incidentally DF tried this a few games ago and it wasn’t a great success from what I can recall. Albeit I am pretty certain Amps had also been moved to CDM and that may have created balance issues.weasel wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:56 pm The main trouble for me against Sunderland was that we only had 2 potential scorers on the pitch, Summerville and James. Bamford as we know is a streaky striker, scores stuff like 7 in 9 matches but then goes the same amount of games without scoring. He is in one of his drought periods now. Rutter is simply abysmal in terms of a goal scoring threat. You can see he has little confidence and often passes up on opportunities to shoot, or when he does shoot the people sitting 20 rows back are in more danger than the opposition keeper. So we have 2 strikers carrying no goal threat and a central midfield with no goals this season and a back 4 that has 2 goals between the 4 of them (Ampadu's brace in the cup) unless you count Gray's pinball goal v Leicester.
For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.
I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.
It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
Gnonto is the answer for me.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
I know what your saying
Just feel we have to get on the front foot early as the longer the game goes on this pissing about at the back allows the opposition to grow in confidence
Kamara no different to an injury free Forshaw
Guess overall more urgency from the off rather than in the last 15 minutes of games
Just feel we have to get on the front foot early as the longer the game goes on this pissing about at the back allows the opposition to grow in confidence
Kamara no different to an injury free Forshaw
Guess overall more urgency from the off rather than in the last 15 minutes of games
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
I’m right there with you, Kenny! Pre-Sunderland, I was clamoring for Farke to simply pick the lineup that demonstrated the greatest sense of urgency in practice leading up to the match. And that was pre-Sunderland.Kennyb41 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:52 pm He only needs to go on the attack right from the off, if and only then when the oppos decide to park the bus, if we can't batter thru it in 45mins, then ok, 2nd half try and drag them out, but ffs ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK, PIN THEM IN THEIR FINAL THIRD AND THROW EVERYTHING AT THEM...At least there won't be any minutes wasted tippy tappy at the back, that game suits virtually every single one of our players !!!
I'm still feckin blazin btw
And i can't feckin stand going down without a fight or giving it ALL we've got, at least the fans will see he's trying his best to break thru, it's driving me insane fer gawds sake
The opportunity is there for the taking, yet we continue to almost sleepwalk out there. I keep saying that changes are imperative and I think a good time should be either right at the start against Blackburn, or a 4-5 substitute switch at HT. Clear messages for scared, pedestrian play need to be sent.
Fly Fishing, Skiing, and The Damned United
- White Riot
- Superstar
- Posts: 16705
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:02 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Regular as clock work the Ipswich manager brings on three subs at sixty minutes, works most times but not against Watford.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
You cannot commit 5 subs at half- time. What if a player gets injured, particularly your keeper or the keeper gets sent off.JoeDenver wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:44 pm I’m right there with you, Kenny! Pre-Sunderland, I was clamoring for Farke to simply pick the lineup that demonstrated the greatest sense of urgency in practice leading up to the match. And that was pre-Sunderland.
The opportunity is there for the taking, yet we continue to almost sleepwalk out there. I keep saying that changes are imperative and I think a good time should be either right at the start against Blackburn, or a 4-5 substitute switch at HT. Clear messages for scared, pedestrian play need to be sent.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Farke needs tweaks not wholesale changes mid game.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Spot on Kenny.Kennyb41 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:52 pm He only needs to go on the attack right from the off, if and only then when the oppos decide to park the bus, if we can't batter thru it in 45mins, then ok, 2nd half try and drag them out, but ffs ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK, PIN THEM IN THEIR FINAL THIRD AND THROW EVERYTHING AT THEM...At least there won't be any minutes wasted tippy tappy at the back, that game suits virtually every single one of our players !!!
I'm still feckin blazin btw
And i can't feckin stand going down without a fight or giving it ALL we've got, at least the fans will see he's trying his best to break thru, it's driving me insane fer gawds sake
In the end its a simple mathematical fact- Increase the time that our forward line have the ball at their feet and you increase our goal scoring chances.
Ampadu and Rodon doing their Fred Astaire /Ginger Rogers impersonation will garner a grand total of Nil point.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
Ginger Rogers was a better dancer than Fred Astaire because she did all the same steps backwards and in heelsMadron wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:58 am Spot on Kenny.
In the end its a simple mathematical fact- Increase the time that our forward line have the ball at their feet and you increase our goal scoring chances.
Ampadu and Rodon doing their Fred Astaire /Ginger Rogers impersonation will garner a grand total of Nil point.
- Orange Box
- Manager
- Posts: 3556
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
- Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
If we make the necessary changes an hour before kick off we won’t need to risk 5 subs at HT. At this stage of the season, tactically we are getting close to ‘sending the keeper forward at corners’ time.
WARNING: During game time, any post I make is not to be taken seriously, neither is it meant as offence. I'm a hot-blooded creature prone to moments of exasperation and expletive.
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
TBF, I was being a bit tongue in cheek with the HT subs comment…more or less to compensate for the inevitable zero changes to the starting lineup and zero subs until the 80th minute strategy that I fear is looming. But honestly, if things are going that poorly against Blackburn (who just got throttled 5-0, mind you), I don’t know.
An honest reflection by Farke should lead him to adding Willy in. That one change is imperative. Bigger question is who is that at the expense of…Geo or James. I’m also in favor of Roberts at the expense of Kamara who looks a shell of his old self of late (thus shifting Gray to MF), but I speculate that Farke will only allow himself to make one change to the lineup.
I’ve also said that whoever demonstrates the most urgency in training would be a good measure for selection…simply because the recent batch of 11 have been anything but.
Nonetheless, zero changes to the starting 11 would be negligent, IMHO.
Fly Fishing, Skiing, and The Damned United
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
He made quite a few changes for the Chelsea game Ron, and we still held our own !Madron wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:58 am Spot on Kenny.
In the end its a simple mathematical fact- Increase the time that our forward line have the ball at their feet and you increase our goal scoring chances.
Ampadu and Rodon doing their Fred Astaire /Ginger Rogers impersonation will garner a grand total of Nil point.
It quite simply, is what these players are best at, and what comes natural to them.
You get the best out of Firpo attacking, which in turn helps Jimmy. The same with Gray and James/Gnonto, which then helps support and bring into play Bamford and Rutter.
We have seen in away games ALL season, a different Leeds, and yes they struggle to break thru when teams park the bus, but fer gawds sake, most teams do when they come up against that. And we are utter dogshit trying what we've recently seen.
I will feckin die tomorrow if he tries this shite again.
Not dependent on Google, the www or 'stats' - Just a guy that puts his eyes to full use on the beautiful game
;@)
;@)
Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion
He is afraid of the counter Kenny. He wants to dominate the game possession wise before whipping the horse. It is difficult at the business end for players to play without fear of making a mistake. You can see it creeping in with a few in particular during the last few games with all the arm waving and passing backwards looking for the safe option.Kennyb41 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:20 pm He made quite a few changes for the Chelsea game Ron, and we still held our own !
It quite simply, is what these players are best at, and what comes natural to them.
You get the best out of Firpo attacking, which in turn helps Jimmy. The same with Gray and James/Gnonto, which then helps support and bring into play Bamford and Rutter.
We have seen in away games ALL season, a different Leeds, and yes they struggle to break thru when teams park the bus, but fer gawds sake, most teams do when they come up against that. And we are utter dogshit trying what we've recently seen.
I will feckin die tomorrow if he tries this shite again.