Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
Kennyb41
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 11148
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:15 am

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Kennyb41 »

Gray.......................Firpo
James - Rutter - Kamara - Summerville
..............Bamford

Every single one of them players could pin Sunderland in their own half, and win possession back high up the field if it is lost, and go again.
Not dependent on Google, the www or 'stats' - Just a guy that puts his eyes to full use on the beautiful game :geek:

;@)
Phild
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:17 pm
Location: Golden BC Canada

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Phild »

Not sure if there is another goalkeeper in the EFL who has as many touches and time in possession than Meslier
User avatar
1964white
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 128898
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by 1964white »

Phild wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:02 pm Not sure if there is another goalkeeper in the EFL who has as many touches and time in possession than Meslier
I doubt it.

Meslier plays more or less as a third centre-back.
Phild
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:17 pm
Location: Golden BC Canada

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Phild »

Meant it in the most negative of ways
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 14259
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Within a mile of Yorkshire

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by weasel »

The main trouble for me against Sunderland was that we only had 2 potential scorers on the pitch, Summerville and James. Bamford as we know is a streaky striker, scores stuff like 7 in 9 matches but then goes the same amount of games without scoring. He is in one of his drought periods now. Rutter is simply abysmal in terms of a goal scoring threat. You can see he has little confidence and often passes up on opportunities to shoot, or when he does shoot the people sitting 20 rows back are in more danger than the opposition keeper. So we have 2 strikers carrying no goal threat and a central midfield with no goals this season and a back 4 that has 2 goals between the 4 of them (Ampadu's brace in the cup) unless you count Gray's pinball goal v Leicester.

For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.

I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.

It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
User avatar
mentalcase
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 7296
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2021 3:19 pm

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by mentalcase »

weasel wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:56 pm The main trouble for me against Sunderland was that we only had 2 potential scorers on the pitch, Summerville and James. Bamford as we know is a streaky striker, scores stuff like 7 in 9 matches but then goes the same amount of games without scoring. He is in one of his drought periods now. Rutter is simply abysmal in terms of a goal scoring threat. You can see he has little confidence and often passes up on opportunities to shoot, or when he does shoot the people sitting 20 rows back are in more danger than the opposition keeper. So we have 2 strikers carrying no goal threat and a central midfield with no goals this season and a back 4 that has 2 goals between the 4 of them (Ampadu's brace in the cup) unless you count Gray's pinball goal v Leicester.

For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.

I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.

It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
You are correct, most of us have been saying the same thing for a long time though.
"Critics are men that watch a battle from a high place, then come down and shoot the survivors"
Phild
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:17 pm
Location: Golden BC Canada

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Phild »

Robert’s for Gray
Gray for Kamara
Gnonto for James
Probably enough changes to start
Half time bring on Joseph if our first half is like recent ones
User avatar
DDB220
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 4322
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by DDB220 »

weasel wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:56 pm The main trouble for me against Sunderland was that we only had 2 potential scorers on the pitch, Summerville and James. Bamford as we know is a streaky striker, scores stuff like 7 in 9 matches but then goes the same amount of games without scoring. He is in one of his drought periods now. Rutter is simply abysmal in terms of a goal scoring threat. You can see he has little confidence and often passes up on opportunities to shoot, or when he does shoot the people sitting 20 rows back are in more danger than the opposition keeper. So we have 2 strikers carrying no goal threat and a central midfield with no goals this season and a back 4 that has 2 goals between the 4 of them (Ampadu's brace in the cup) unless you count Gray's pinball goal v Leicester.

For me we need to get either Piroe or Joseph into the starting line-up. It is all well and good saying that Bamford was scoring and playing well at the start of 2024 but that was the Bamford where the goals were going in, one off his arm, one deflected in from James's free kick etc. The Bamford now is the couldn't hit a barn, let alone the door, version.

I would also be tempted to put Roberts in at rightback and switch Gray into midfield. That increases our chances of scoring from both positions.

It doesn't need big changes just a tweak to give us more threat.
The problem with taking Kamara out is that Firpo loses that defensive cover. Kamara has a great engine. Watch the Sunderland game after Kamara is subbed as proof of how his absence means Firpo drops deep. It is a big ask to flog Archie to fill that role. Unless you put Byram in. Incidentally DF tried this a few games ago and it wasn’t a great success from what I can recall. Albeit I am pretty certain Amps had also been moved to CDM and that may have created balance issues.
Gnonto is the answer for me.
Phild
Reserve Player
Reserve Player
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 11:17 pm
Location: Golden BC Canada

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Phild »

I know what your saying
Just feel we have to get on the front foot early as the longer the game goes on this pissing about at the back allows the opposition to grow in confidence
Kamara no different to an injury free Forshaw
Guess overall more urgency from the off rather than in the last 15 minutes of games
User avatar
JoeDenver
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:58 pm

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by JoeDenver »

Kennyb41 wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:52 pm He only needs to go on the attack right from the off, if and only then when the oppos decide to park the bus, if we can't batter thru it in 45mins, then ok, 2nd half try and drag them out, but ffs ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK, PIN THEM IN THEIR FINAL THIRD AND THROW EVERYTHING AT THEM...At least there won't be any minutes wasted tippy tappy at the back, that game suits virtually every single one of our players !!!

I'm still feckin blazin btw :rant: :rant:

And i can't feckin stand going down without a fight or giving it ALL we've got, at least the fans will see he's trying his best to break thru, it's driving me insane fer gawds sake :evil: :evil:
I’m right there with you, Kenny! Pre-Sunderland, I was clamoring for Farke to simply pick the lineup that demonstrated the greatest sense of urgency in practice leading up to the match. And that was pre-Sunderland.

The opportunity is there for the taking, yet we continue to almost sleepwalk out there. I keep saying that changes are imperative and I think a good time should be either right at the start against Blackburn, or a 4-5 substitute switch at HT. Clear messages for scared, pedestrian play need to be sent.
Fly Fishing, Skiing, and The Damned United
User avatar
White Riot
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 16705
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:02 pm
Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by White Riot »

1964white wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 7:42 pm I doubt it.

Meslier plays more or less as a third centre-back.
Like I say Farke sees him as our playmaker :roll:
User avatar
Sean_Nile
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
Posts: 995
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2023 2:25 pm

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Sean_Nile »

Regular as clock work the Ipswich manager brings on three subs at sixty minutes, works most times but not against Watford.
User avatar
DDB220
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 4322
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by DDB220 »

JoeDenver wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:44 pm I’m right there with you, Kenny! Pre-Sunderland, I was clamoring for Farke to simply pick the lineup that demonstrated the greatest sense of urgency in practice leading up to the match. And that was pre-Sunderland.

The opportunity is there for the taking, yet we continue to almost sleepwalk out there. I keep saying that changes are imperative and I think a good time should be either right at the start against Blackburn, or a 4-5 substitute switch at HT. Clear messages for scared, pedestrian play need to be sent.
You cannot commit 5 subs at half- time. What if a player gets injured, particularly your keeper or the keeper gets sent off.
User avatar
DDB220
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 4322
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by DDB220 »

Farke needs tweaks not wholesale changes mid game.
User avatar
Madron
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2093
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:46 pm

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Madron »

Kennyb41 wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 6:52 pm He only needs to go on the attack right from the off, if and only then when the oppos decide to park the bus, if we can't batter thru it in 45mins, then ok, 2nd half try and drag them out, but ffs ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK, PIN THEM IN THEIR FINAL THIRD AND THROW EVERYTHING AT THEM...At least there won't be any minutes wasted tippy tappy at the back, that game suits virtually every single one of our players !!!

I'm still feckin blazin btw :rant: :rant:

And i can't feckin stand going down without a fight or giving it ALL we've got, at least the fans will see he's trying his best to break thru, it's driving me insane fer gawds sake :evil: :evil:
Spot on Kenny.
In the end its a simple mathematical fact- Increase the time that our forward line have the ball at their feet and you increase our goal scoring chances.
Ampadu and Rodon doing their Fred Astaire /Ginger Rogers impersonation will garner a grand total of Nil point.
User avatar
Sean_Nile
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
Posts: 995
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2023 2:25 pm

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Sean_Nile »

Madron wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:58 am Spot on Kenny.
In the end its a simple mathematical fact- Increase the time that our forward line have the ball at their feet and you increase our goal scoring chances.
Ampadu and Rodon doing their Fred Astaire /Ginger Rogers impersonation will garner a grand total of Nil point.
Ginger Rogers was a better dancer than Fred Astaire because she did all the same steps backwards and in heels
User avatar
Orange Box
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3556
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2021 3:51 pm
Location: West of Scotland, formerly Cas Vegas

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Orange Box »

If we make the necessary changes an hour before kick off we won’t need to risk 5 subs at HT. At this stage of the season, tactically we are getting close to ‘sending the keeper forward at corners’ time.
WARNING: During game time, any post I make is not to be taken seriously, neither is it meant as offence. I'm a hot-blooded creature prone to moments of exasperation and expletive.
User avatar
JoeDenver
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 1989
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:58 pm

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by JoeDenver »

DDB220 wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:31 am You cannot commit 5 subs at half- time. What if a player gets injured, particularly your keeper or the keeper gets sent off.
TBF, I was being a bit tongue in cheek with the HT subs comment…more or less to compensate for the inevitable zero changes to the starting lineup and zero subs until the 80th minute strategy that I fear is looming. But honestly, if things are going that poorly against Blackburn (who just got throttled 5-0, mind you), I don’t know.

An honest reflection by Farke should lead him to adding Willy in. That one change is imperative. Bigger question is who is that at the expense of…Geo or James. I’m also in favor of Roberts at the expense of Kamara who looks a shell of his old self of late (thus shifting Gray to MF), but I speculate that Farke will only allow himself to make one change to the lineup.

I’ve also said that whoever demonstrates the most urgency in training would be a good measure for selection…simply because the recent batch of 11 have been anything but.

Nonetheless, zero changes to the starting 11 would be negligent, IMHO.
Fly Fishing, Skiing, and The Damned United
User avatar
Kennyb41
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 11148
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:15 am

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by Kennyb41 »

Madron wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:58 am Spot on Kenny.
In the end its a simple mathematical fact- Increase the time that our forward line have the ball at their feet and you increase our goal scoring chances.
Ampadu and Rodon doing their Fred Astaire /Ginger Rogers impersonation will garner a grand total of Nil point.
He made quite a few changes for the Chelsea game Ron, and we still held our own !

It quite simply, is what these players are best at, and what comes natural to them.

You get the best out of Firpo attacking, which in turn helps Jimmy. The same with Gray and James/Gnonto, which then helps support and bring into play Bamford and Rutter.

We have seen in away games ALL season, a different Leeds, and yes they struggle to break thru when teams park the bus, but fer gawds sake, most teams do when they come up against that. And we are utter dogshit trying what we've recently seen.

I will feckin die tomorrow if he tries this shite again.
Not dependent on Google, the www or 'stats' - Just a guy that puts his eyes to full use on the beautiful game :geek:

;@)
User avatar
DDB220
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 4322
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Sunderland - Post Match Discussion

Post by DDB220 »

Kennyb41 wrote: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:20 pm He made quite a few changes for the Chelsea game Ron, and we still held our own !

It quite simply, is what these players are best at, and what comes natural to them.

You get the best out of Firpo attacking, which in turn helps Jimmy. The same with Gray and James/Gnonto, which then helps support and bring into play Bamford and Rutter.

We have seen in away games ALL season, a different Leeds, and yes they struggle to break thru when teams park the bus, but fer gawds sake, most teams do when they come up against that. And we are utter dogshit trying what we've recently seen.

I will feckin die tomorrow if he tries this shite again.
He is afraid of the counter Kenny. He wants to dominate the game possession wise before whipping the horse. It is difficult at the business end for players to play without fear of making a mistake. You can see it creeping in with a few in particular during the last few games with all the arm waving and passing backwards looking for the safe option.
Post Reply