Ah sort of like in a court of law where you look at all the facts at hand and then try to come up with a verdict that suggests something did or didn't happen based on those facts. You don't know whether what has been suggested happened but you form your opinion based on what you do know has happened.DDB220 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 11, 2023 5:21 pm Lot of supposition to fit respective narratives.
Faaip makes a big issue about facts and then draws his own conclusions.
People’s opposing views will always rely on possibilities and try to to make them fit their narrative.
Furry woodland creature and Crazy Horse are clearly big fans of Hans Christian Andersen.
To put it scientifically it is bollcoks. We are all guilty of it - some just believe their own bollcoks and will argue that theirs are the biggest.
About the nest manager -it is anyones guess. I bet neither Bielsa or Gracia made any of the lists before they were appointed.
Out of what is on offer here Rodger’s is the one with the pedigree in my bollcoks opinion.
Others would call it making an educated guess. Much more preferable to someone having their own opinion, not based on any facts, but then try to pass it off as if it were factual.
