Mountain wrote: ↑Wed Sep 21, 2022 12:35 pm
But...hold on...surely fans realise that the Court case and the entire litigation is not about whether JKA was a good or bad player?
The Court case is over the terms of the contract. It's very much a legal battle over interpretation of contractual paperwork. That's the disaster.
Are fans really saying the terms of the contract were agreed to by Bielsa? Afaik he doesn't have any qualifications in law! I mean, did Orta and Radz not realise he needed an interpreter? If they decided he'd get final approval of very complex contractual terms (and they clearly are complex given the protracted litigation) ...that's insane.
Of course Bielsa isn't responsible for the fees and whatnot we agreed to pay for JKA.
He isn't responsible for the wording of contracts and all that stuff, that is on Kinnear and Orta I'd imagine and Radz for signing off over all.
Orta scouted and analysed the player and all that as is his job. Orta probably helped negotiate the fees and all that but Kinnear as Chief Executive will have been heavily involved to on the financial side.
And Radz as overall boss will have signed off.
You could even say of the 3 Radz is least responsible except for listening to his two employees, but as the owner and overall boss he is complicit.
Bielsa is only responsible because he will have given Orta his approval for the signing after Undoubtedly having done his own due diligence using his own team of analysts.
Which given JKA's well publicised disciplinary and fitness issues, not to mention his lack of recent football is strange.
If Bielsa hadn't have agreed to JKA the player when Orta proposed him then the deal never happens.
And we know Bielsa had no issue saying if he felt a player had been signed against his will because when Marseille signed Doria Bielsa said publicly he had had no input in the deal.