As I said, nothing much after that. One chance, not taken, with 60 minutes left to play.
Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
- Carrick Dave
- Site Contributor

- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
-
SG90
- Superstar

- Posts: 23108
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm
-
SG90
- Superstar

- Posts: 23108
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
We had a 3 on 1 in the second half and Bamford screwed that up too.Carrick Dave wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:27 pm As I said, nothing much after that. One chance, not taken, with 60 minutes left to play.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155102
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
- Jaydog
- Superstar

- Posts: 21199
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:52 pm
- Location: Here
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
That’s because Cooper can’t do a very simple thing and play a ball up the touch line.
I declare my love for Saint Daniel and I can shoehorn him in to any conversation.
- Carrick Dave
- Site Contributor

- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm
- Jaydog
- Superstar

- Posts: 21199
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:52 pm
- Location: Here
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
Pointless argument I know Dave but 2-0 is a very different game. Even if we are s**t for the next 60 minutes the fact is we are 2 up and maybe get a point.Carrick Dave wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:27 pm As I said, nothing much after that. One chance, not taken, with 60 minutes left to play.
I declare my love for Saint Daniel and I can shoehorn him in to any conversation.
-
DDB220
- Superstar

- Posts: 7062
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
I remember Phil Hay was astonished that we never made a bid for Eze after we were promoted. At the time Orta was purely fixated in buying Spanish as he felt the UK market was over priced. Eze cost Palace 25 million. I won’t make the obvious comparison.
The only downside to Eze he tends to get injured regularly. But he is a game changer. What he did to Cooper was class. The point is this - if Coops would have let him get a first time shot away by not trying to close him down immediately he would have been criticised. What Eze did was pure class and very few defenders would have avoided falling for that feint.
The only downside to Eze he tends to get injured regularly. But he is a game changer. What he did to Cooper was class. The point is this - if Coops would have let him get a first time shot away by not trying to close him down immediately he would have been criticised. What Eze did was pure class and very few defenders would have avoided falling for that feint.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155102
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
It's amazing how us fans see things so differently to our board, Bob
We're always looking in the opposite direction when it comes to signing proven PL players.
- Carrick Dave
- Site Contributor

- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
You’re right bud, and sadly pointless is the salient factor.
Is it just me or does anyone else scream at the telly in frustration when we try to pass the ball to Paddy on the 6-yard line from the edge of the box when there’s a shot on? Jack did it in the first two minutes today.
I think many of our problems in front of goal stem from not shooting often enough, especially from distance, and trying to walk the ball in against big, physical and canny defenders.
- andrewjohnsmith
- Superstar

- Posts: 13057
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
- Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
Palace been in the premier league a few years longer than us. Generated more income in recent seasons and able to spend substantially more in the market than we have.
On LS11 Opposition View the Palace podcaster was saying that their signings have been much more focused this season. Before it was a bit more of a scattered approach. Now they identify a couple of key positions and make signings accordingly. We're still very much in the scattered phase - our whole championship squad needs to improve but we can only do things incrementally. In that regard, we're a few years behind where Palace are now in terms of squad assessment and transfer business.
- White Riot
- Superstar

- Posts: 22381
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:02 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
Yeah, mate same here. I've been working today , so could hardly watch it. Seemed to start brightly then it all went to s**t.
Been saying for quite a while that this squad needs a good clear out, but Radz was happy flogging KP n Raphinha and not investing anything extra.
Can't say I'm shocked and refuse to get bothered by this s**t show.
We've had a good run of fixtures and came out with insufficient points. The big guns will be licking their chops at the prospect of roasting us.
Jesse needs to sort this quickly.
-
SG90
- Superstar

- Posts: 23108
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
No it was Bamford. All he had to do was play one in and he took too long on the ball and lost it.Carrick Dave wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:31 pm So, two chances in 60 minutes? And it was Rodrigo who screwed that up.
What chances did Palace create other than the goals?
- andrewjohnsmith
- Superstar

- Posts: 13057
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 4:58 pm
- Location: California (Donny Born-n-Bred)
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
Like I said before though. We can't take on wages of Coady or Tarkowski if nobody is willing to take on our current CB's. We're not Everton. We can't afford to carry 5 first team CB's. We looked at our squad preseason and decided it was much more important to sign the players in positions we did. Defence could be improved, but we can't afford to do everything at once.
Even free defenders cost a lot of money in wages and signing bonuses.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155102
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
I was cursing Paddy when he missed that chance & also he made a poor pass with two players in their own when we caught Palace on the break. Rodrigo made a similar error. Far too much cursing from me with all the simple errors we were making in the second-half. We create our own downfall.
- Carrick Dave
- Site Contributor

- Posts: 6739
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:46 pm
- White Riot
- Superstar

- Posts: 22381
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2019 2:02 pm
- Location: Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
Maybe worth putting Struijk in at CB, where he should have been since the season started. Oh yeah I forgot we don't have a left back
I'd put Hjelde at CB, and keep Cooper and Llorente well away from it.
- 1964white
- Lord Southwold

- Posts: 155102
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
- Twitter: @1964white
-
SG90
- Superstar

- Posts: 23108
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
It was Bamford. I watched the match.
-
SG90
- Superstar

- Posts: 23108
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm
Re: Crystal Palace v Leeds Utd Match Thread - Bamford starts for Leeds
So it wasn't just me who saw that?1964white wrote: ↑Sun Oct 09, 2022 7:47 pm I was cursing Paddy when he missed that chance & also he made a poor pass with two players in their own when we caught Palace on the break. Rodrigo made a similar error. Far too much cursing from me with all the simple errors we were making in the second-half. We create our own downfall.