Arsenal v Leeds. Correct Score/First Scorer. 5pm Saturday 23rd August

[whiteswan]

0-1 Gnonto (Positive Hec)

[Muppet the Cat]

2-0 N/A (Cat)

[hector]

Don't worry Duckie..... it won't last

[Madron]

Well I could pick 2-0 and be wrong. Shouldn't I still be able to pick a first goal scorer in case I am wrong?

Either that or I should be able to win a point for predicting the first goal scorer was no goal scorer

I agree with you Andrew, .Correct score and first scorer are independent predictions . There's no bonus for getting both right.
All it does is make predicting Leeds not to score a bit silly ,as you take away 25% of possible points straight away. Bit unfair really.
I did predict Leeds not to score against Everton ,but also that Willy would score first., thinking it would be ok. It confused '64 a bit and he
put me right .
Its up to '64 but I think the fairest thing would be to allow these contradictory predictions. Can't see any reason not to.

[andrewjohnsmith]

I agree with you Andrew, .Correct score and first scorer are independent predictions . There's no bonus for getting both right.
All it does is make predicting Leeds not to score a bit silly ,as you take away 25% of possible points straight away. Bit unfair really.
I did predict Leeds not to score against Everton ,but also that Willy would score first., thinking it would be ok. It confused '64 a bit and he
put me right .
Its up to '64 but I think the fairest thing would be to allow these contradictory predictions. Can't see any reason not to.

Makes no sense picking 2-0 as it takes away your option to pick the goal scorer and makes less points available

So I went 2-1 in the end, so I could pick a goal scorer, and play for maximum points

[CUSSIE01]

1-1 Piroe (Cussie)

[Onemanstanding]

0-0 N/A (Onemanstanding)

[1964white]

I agree with you Andrew, .Correct score and first scorer are independent predictions . There's no bonus for getting both right.
All it does is make predicting Leeds not to score a bit silly ,as you take away 25% of possible points straight away. Bit unfair really.
I did predict Leeds not to score against Everton ,but also that Willy would score first., thinking it would be ok. It confused '64 a bit and he
put me right .
Its up to '64 but I think the fairest thing would be to allow these contradictory predictions. Can't see any reason not to.

To be discussed on the Moderator forum, as this competition has been running in the current format for over twenty years.

[SnifferClarke]

2-0 (sniffer)

[Barlow Boy]

0-0 N/A (Barlow Boy)

Thank you

[Orange Box]

1-1 Struijk (Orange Box)

[White Lotus]

0-1 Okafor (White Lotus)

[1964white]

2-1 Nmecha (64)

[Victor_OTT_17]

3-1 Okafor (Victor)

[onemoreslogan]

Late, surprising equalizer:

1-1 Aaronson (onemoreslogan)

[1964white]

Late, surprising equalizer:

1-1 Aaronson (onemoreslogan)

Welcome back, Onemore.

Hope all is well with you!

[Pullhard]

2-0 N/A (Pullhard)

[Finnatic]

4-0 N/A (Finnatic)

Earlier, I did think we’d sneak a draw or lose narrowly but suddenly had a bad feeling (probably just nerves)

[pjm2019]

I agree with you Andrew, .Correct score and first scorer are independent predictions . There's no bonus for getting both right.
All it does is make predicting Leeds not to score a bit silly ,as you take away 25% of possible points straight away. Bit unfair really.
I did predict Leeds not to score against Everton ,but also that Willy would score first., thinking it would be ok. It confused '64 a bit and he
put me right .
Its up to '64 but I think the fairest thing would be to allow these contradictory predictions. Can't see any reason not to.

if you predict 0-0 you simply CANNOT then name a player to score

[yorkshiremackem]

3-1 leeds James 1st goal (ym)