The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for deadline day faliure

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11888
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Breakfast Debate The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for deadline day faliure

Post by Ellandback1 »



Good Morning. It's Tuesday 2nd September, and here are the latest headlines from Elland Road...


Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for reneging on Wilson deal

Leeds United’s deadline day pursuit of Fulham’s versatile attacking midfielder Harry Wilson culminated in a dramatic collapse, leaving the Elland Road hierarchy pointing the finger at Fulham for allegedly reneging on the deal at the eleventh hour. The most striking image of this failed transfer saga unfolded in the skies, as a plane carrying Wilson, having departed Staverton Airport, abruptly aborted its flight and returned to Gloucester, leaving flight trackers and fans utterly bewildered.

Fulham offer a completely different narrative, insisting they had informed Leeds from the outset that Wilson was not for sale. They point to Leeds’ initial approach for a season-long loan, a move deemed highly improbable given Wilson had only 12 months remaining on his contract. Despite the Cottagers firm denials, various media outlets had, throughout the day, suggested they would indeed be prepared to sanction a permanent deal for Wilson, contingent on securing their own transfer targets.

Fulham ultimately landed all three deadline day signings and, according to multiple reports across the press, even agreed a fee for Wilson, making their alleged eleventh-hour withdrawal, or their earlier firm stance somewhat deceitful. The precise sequence of events and the true nature of negotiations between the two clubs remain shrouded in conflicting accounts.





Widespread anger among Leeds fans as recruitment job left unfinished

Deadline day became a catalyst for widespread anger and despair among the Elland Road faithful as the transfer window slammed shut without any new arrivals. Social media became toxic with incensed reactions from supporters, frustrated by the club's failure to secure the attacking reinforcements manager Daniel Farke had so vehemently called for.

Despite an overhaul that saw ten new players arrive at Elland Road this summer, the prevailing sentiment among fans is one of disappointment, particularly concerning the final third. Farke himself had issued a stark warning over the weekend, cautioning that without additional attacking quality, the Whites could find themselves staring down the barrel of an immediate return to the Championship.

The frustration runs deeper than just the lack of final-day signings; it’s a critique of the Leeds hierarchy's overall transfer strategy. Many fans feel that despite the numerous additions, the crucial areas of attack were left perilously short in both numbers and quality. Rumours of financial constraints were rife, perhaps in a bid to quelle expectation.

The Whites have only recouped £8 million from player sales, but have failed to secure loan fees for failed to secure loan fee's for five of their six temporary departures. According to Sky Sports Germany journalist Florian Plettenberg, only Max Wober secured a monitory fee, and that was a mere £1m.

While there are few complaints about the calibre of players Leeds have managed to bring in, the glaring omission in attack casts a long, ominous shadow. When supporters cast their eyes towards other clubs languishing at the wrong end of the Premier League table, and compare, it's difficult to see an escape route

Have the 49ers inadvertently set the stage for a season-long battle against relegation? The once-optimistic spirit of a new Premier League campaign has, for many Leeds fans, unequivocally curdled into anxiety and indignation.





Gyabi completes free transfer to Hull

Darko Gyabi has completed a permanent move to Hull City, signing a three-year deal with an option for a fourth. This transfer, however, is notable for its intricate structure, driven by Hull's current transfer embargo which restricted them to only free transfers or loan agreements.

As a result, Leeds United have reportedly sanctioned Gyabi's departure on a free. To compensate for this, Leeds have inserted a 50% sell-on clause into his contract, ensuring the Whites receive a significant portion of any future transfer fee should he come good in the future.

Leeds have had no shortage of interest in the youngster, with five clubs chasing his signature, two of which are in France, but it's understood he was keen to stay local, and will join up with former teammate Joe Gelhardt who has already netted twice in three games for the Tigers.


Last edited by Ellandback1 on Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 78912
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by The Subhuman »

Thing is we should never have left it so late that we left ourselves open to that.
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
VinnysTattoo
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1009
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2021 6:55 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by VinnysTattoo »

The Wilson deal smacked of last minute desperation.

If we really wanted him surely a conversation should have taken place a lot earlier.
However, the club was aiming higher but firing blanks.
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23079
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by SG90 »

The issue isn't Harry Wilson, who let's face it, was last minute desperation. The issue is we had four months to add creativity and didn't. We didn't even attempt a loan signing until two days before the window was shut and Chelski stole in.
User avatar
White Lotus
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
Posts: 564
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2025 6:13 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by White Lotus »

Thank you Elland, there you have it - Fulham along with Villa and Spurs probably just 'mucked us around'

Unlucky Farke, you've got what you've got, now crack on and keep us up - Best of luck.
danhirons
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3881
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2014 11:21 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by danhirons »

should have signed solomon months ago

let the goal drought continue!
Jammy 07
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3801
Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2020 10:09 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Jammy 07 »

The decision to allow Ramazani to leave on loan now looks flawed.
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23079
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by SG90 »

danhirons wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:38 am should have signed solomon months ago

let the goal drought continue!
Spurs were demanding far too much for a player that wasn't in their plans
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11888
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Ellandback1 »

White Lotus wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:35 am Thank you Elland, there you have it - Fulham along with Villa and Spurs probably just 'mucked us around'

Unlucky Farke, you've got what you've got, now crack on and keep us up - Best of luck.
I don't know if it's just me, I I feel Leeds get trodden on a lot by other clubs. Not just this window, in the past too - some of it self inflicted, some not. I do feel that IF we go down, we are in a much better position to bounce straight back up again.
User avatar
Chilli D
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 8769
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2018 2:31 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Chilli D »

Either Leeds or Fulham are lying regarding Harry Wilson.
If Fulham agreed to let him join us, the club should produce evidence. There must be a email or some form of documentation.
The flowers of common sense do not grow in everyone's garden
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11888
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Ellandback1 »

SG90 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:09 am Spurs were demanding far too much for a player that wasn't in their plans
Okafor's stats were far more appealing. Saying that, Leeds only approached Milan after Solomon had already turned Leeds down at least once.
User avatar
PhoenixUnited
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:34 pm
Location: Leicester U.K

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by PhoenixUnited »

The end of term report on the Transfer Team at LUFC will read "Must do better". The BIG question is - Can they?

Its all very well pointing fingers at others because we could not get business done or shrugging shoulders that players chose or preferred to go elsewhere. The reality is that the apparent "targets" were optimistic punts as opposed to researched options where groundwork and frameworks had been worked through - there are ways and means to get this done chaps! - so that once you show your cards the chances of nasty surprises is reduced considerably.

There was also a ring fence around affordability. We do not have the financial reach of the top dogs in the Premiership. Indeed we can't really compete with the mid table teams either. The Transfer Team knew that so the question is - did they pursue realistic targets (without believing everything that click bait puts out) or did they just faff about in the last 3 weeks of the window in desperation which is what it looks like.

Will they get their act together for the January Window? I somehow doubt it.

Oh well we are where we are and Daniel Farke has to make of the squad what he will
Keep The Faith MOT WAL
Never mind, it'll all come out in the wash............
User avatar
Clitheroe White
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1678
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2022 8:38 am

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for deadline day fali

Post by Clitheroe White »

Anger - no. Disappointment and a little frustration - yes.

However. We know what we have until January (unless a free agent joins). The new attacking players haven't got going yet. I have a sneaky feeling DCL / Okafor / Nmecha will all prove their worth as they get fitter and become more comfortable with Farke's tactics.

Then there is the bonus of Harry Gray who is being carefully managed, but can foresee a time later this season when he helps sneak a valuable goal or two.

I am frustrated at letting Largie leave, even more so now haven't signed any more attacking players. That is a waste. Glad he hasn't left properly.

Also frustrated at why we left it so late to try and complete the deals. I know we got undercut / gazumped by other clubs but then maybe we need to be more realistic about what the price to win was.
User avatar
PhoenixUnited
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2259
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2022 1:34 pm
Location: Leicester U.K

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by PhoenixUnited »

SG90 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:09 am Spurs were demanding far too much for a player that wasn't in their plans
Is that a fact or an assumption?

Or Daniel Farke felt that he had enough coverage on the left wing in Gnonto and Harisson and didn't need another left hooker
Keep The Faith MOT WAL
Never mind, it'll all come out in the wash............
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23079
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by SG90 »

PhoenixUnited wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:25 am Is that a fact or an assumption?

Or Daniel Farke felt that he had enough coverage on the left wing in Gnonto and Harisson and didn't need another left hooker
They quoted us £50m for Joe Rodon in the Championship lol. The fact we moved on to other targets suggests it was likely.
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11888
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Ellandback1 »

Chilli D wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:13 am Either Leeds or Fulham are lying regarding Harry Wilson.
If Fulham agreed to let him join us, the club should produce evidence. There must be a email or some form of documentation.
Leeds signed their portion of the deal sheet but Fulham didn't sign theirs! That's the document needed to secure the transfer before the 7pm deadline. Leeds would then have been allowed two further hours to complete the medical etc.
User avatar
Irish Ian
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 17183
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:53 pm
Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Irish Ian »

VinnysTattoo wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 8:31 am The Wilson deal smacked of last minute desperation.

If we really wanted him surely a conversation should have taken place a lot earlier.
However, the club was aiming higher but firing blanks.
I think we turned to Wilson because of lack of options, but even if we were in for him earlier, Fulham were waiting to get their targets and wouldn't move.

Deadline day always has these issues.

We lost
'
"Football is about the people and the players,” he said. “Then there are those who will mingle in the middle: the coaches, executives and journalists. That last group represents the worst part about football" Marcelo Bielsa
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11888
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Ellandback1 »

PhoenixUnited wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:25 am Is that a fact or an assumption?

Or Daniel Farke felt that he had enough coverage on the left wing in Gnonto and Harisson and didn't need another left hooker
Solly turned us down at least once over the summer
User avatar
Ellandback1
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 11888
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 3:01 pm
Twitter: @EllandBack1
Location: The truth is out there

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by Ellandback1 »

Irish Ian wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:33 am I think we turned to Wilson because of lack of options, but even if we were in for him earlier, Fulham were waiting to get their targets and wouldn't move.

Deadline day always has these issues.

We lost
Fulham have to be looked upon as possible relegation candidates, so would have been stupid to let Wilson go to Leeds.
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 78912
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: The #LUFC Breakfast Debate (Tuesday 2nd September) - Leeds point the finger of blame at Fulham for dealine dat faliu

Post by The Subhuman »

Ellandback1 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 02, 2025 9:12 am I don't know if it's just me, I I feel Leeds get trodden on a lot by other clubs. Not just this window, in the past too - some of it self inflicted, some not. I do feel that IF we go down, we are in a much better position to bounce straight back up again.
That will happen with an amateur as DoF
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
Post Reply