Transfer deadline day

[GreennWhite]

Look sunny Jim, it is you who brought up the concept of stalking... which most people consider to be a negative appellation. With that one word you turn the ordinary into sinister.

Brand someone as a stalker, is surely an attempt to to defame them in some way, and try and gain sympathy, that the big bad stalker is using hurty words... poor poor me.

I question your motives for even bringing up the word and continuing to use it in multiple messages... repeat a lie often enough and people will begin to believe it.

I have to ask myself when does a simple reply turn out to be a stalking message, and I suspect it is one where the reply disagrees with what you have written.

He will twist and twist his words to suit his own agenda, he has done so for a long time, and will never change. Gets him the attention he thrives on.
Throws in the odd ( probably lots of them ) misquote as well and hopes people believe that its the truth, some might call that lies

[The Subhuman]

Lets bully CJay day again is it? That came around quick...

[Sean_Nile]

Far more simple than that

Same as Kenneth used to do I don't like indirect snide little digs like the one I responded to.

They bug me.

Quote me directly and its absolutely fine I couldn't care less.

You can write as many as you like just be upfront.

If I might make an observation if you can read a message by me or Kenny or whoever that doesn't even mention your name, yet you can come to the conclusion that it is a dig about you, then it must mean you recognise yourself in the content of the message.

That is either remarkable self awareness or signs of megomania where everything has to be about you.

Thanks for saying you would prefer and allow direct quotes to your messages, and I presume that if someone disagrees with you on any topic you will not resort to calling them a stalker.

[Shando]

The argument about wanting a decent backup fb is really non-existent/non-sensical, those rolls now are paramount to any decent teams attacking potential, the best clubs all want them, that's a fact. If you are weak in those areas you will get severely punished and those areas will be targeted like crazy, Farke knew Firpo would be a liability there as we all know, he'd have gone out of his way to persuade him to stay and not immediately insisted on getting a good one in Guds, to me that is plain to see, it is an absolute pre requisite going up into the Prem. For little old LUFC we have in Bogle, Guds and now Justin as good if not better than the lower teams we need to compete with, back up in Justin is essential not only for injury but rotation too whilst not weakening the team, to have the 3 we have for approx 20m is fantastic work considering the amounts money clubs will pay - I just don't see any argument there at all, crazy.

On the attacking front, no manager in his right mind would say he is 'happy' even if he was, they don't, they always want more, as it happens Farke was as always, telling the truth ' I'm short in the offense and would like more' - I believe like 100's here that a 10 and possibly A.N.Other would have been the icing on the cake going forward, they tried right up until 7pm and it wasn't to be, planes were even on standby and other names leading up to Wilson were banded around, so why lash out, they were trying but players wouldn't come or clubs wouldn't let them, why be 'cry babies' we are where we are, just get on with it now, nothing changes.

The argument about prioritising a 10m cracking back up against missing out on an attacker is totally flawed and total bull-crap.
It just does not stand up at all.

Aimvho.

[CUSSIE01]

Maybe we could sell the tea lady!

Noooooooooooooooooooo

[Cjay]

If I might make an observation if you can read a message by me or Kenny or whoever that doesn't even mention your name, yet you can come to the conclusion that it is a dig about you, then it must mean you recognise yourself in the content of the message.

That is either remarkable self awareness or signs of megomania where everything has to be about you.

Thanks for saying you would prefer and allow direct quotes to your messages, and I presume that if someone disagrees with you on any topic you will not resort to calling them a stalker.

Or I recognise the poster who often does it, is a couple on here most of whom I've confronted at some point.

So again thank you for your psycho analysis but it's not that deep, they are plainly obvious.

This weird narrative I react because of someone disagreeing with me is bizarre given people disagree with me on a daily basis.

Disagreeing I'm fine with.

Cowardly snide belittling I won't ignore, not in the real world not on here.

[Cjay]

He will twist and twist his words to suit his own agenda, he has done so for a long time, and will never change. Gets him the attention he thrives on.
Throws in the odd ( probably lots of them ) misquote as well and hopes people believe that its the truth, some might call that lies

And the same goes for you as I've told you before.

Just block me problem solved.

[Sean_Nile]

Cowardly snide belittling I won't ignore, not in the real world not on here.

Yet it is precisely that trait that you so often express when discussing Daniel Farke past and present. Accusing others of the things you do yourself.

[Cjay]

Yet it is precisely that trait that you so often express when discussing Daniel Farke past and present. Accusing others of the things you do yourself.

For such a seemingly intelligent chap that's one of the stupidest things I've seen on here.

Please clarify how your comment is true.

Think about what you have written . . . .

You are accusing me of being cowardly and underhand saying things that are my opinion on a football manager who doesn't know I exist.

So you are riding to the defence of someone because my comments are so awful despite the fact this person is completely oblivious to the existence.

My comments are always pretty clearly towards Daniel Farke, so if he read them he would know.

So your comment is plainly wrong . . . .

I'm many things perhaps, but never been afraid of saying things to someone's face I assure you.

[Shando]

Just reading back a few pages and misunderstanding some of it?
If you quote someone you're stalking?
If you don't quote someone you're annoying them? I'm a bit lost?

My Grandad used to make me laugh whilst watching a scrum when he took me to rugby and he'd comment - "they're all talking about me aren't they, i'll bash em?" and he used to tell me that - "the world doesn't revolve around self-centred people son that think they know it all"
Paranoia - seems to be the word for today.
Just a thought.

[Sean_Nile]

For such a seemingly intelligent chap that's one of the stupidest things I've seen on here.

Perception is everything. I suggest you start a poll asking the simple question.

What is your perception of Cjay's thoughts on Daniel Farke, are they positive or negative or neutral?

The answers would be enlightening

[Cjay]

Perception is everything. I suggest you start a poll asking the simple question.

What is your perception of Cjay's thoughts on Daniel Farke, are they positive or negative or neutral?

The answers would be enlightening

My last comment on this as things to do.

That isn't relevant to what you said.

You said I make cowardly and snide comments to a person it's literally impossible for me to say anything to directly as a defence.

But were that person to read my posts they would instantly know it was about them and therefore nothing snide about it.

Nothing to do with perception, it's plainly nonsense.

So I presume you will apologise?

And make your poll if you like , that doesn't bother me, I don't give my opinion to be popular.

[Sean_Nile]

My last comment on this as things to do.

That isn't relevant to what you said.

You said I make cowardly and snide comments to a person it's literally impossible for me to say anything to directly as a defence.

But were that person to read my posts they would instantly know it was about them and therefore nothing snide about it.

Nothing to do with perception, it's plainly nonsense.

So I presume you will apologise?

And make your poll if you like , that doesn't bother me, I don't give my opinion to be popular.

I asked you to make a poll not that I would make it. You need to read more carefully.

Semantics my dear chap the demeanor of the majority of your posts regarding Farke, have a subtle snide undertone. They may not be personally directed to him, but certainly their objective is to besmirch his capabilities and character, and you make no bones about it that you would like to see him gone, and over the three years he has been at Leeds, have made suggestions as to who would be a more suitable manager.

Apologise!!! of course not, that is caving in to wokeness. When a comedians or a politician makes a statement the woke brigade don't like they always demand an apology, and if they do get it, they pile on more, because they perceive it as a weakness, then the pursuit is relentless until they get a cancellation.

Is that your aim?

Hail Geronimo, and Kenny's not dead.

[Cjay]

[The Subhuman]

Perception is everything. I suggest you start a poll asking the simple question.

What is your perception of Cjay's thoughts on Daniel Farke, are they positive or negative or neutral?

The answers would be enlightening

neutral, obviously....

[Shando]

Then what a fantastic thing then that is what DCL has done, absolutely superb for LUFC and it says to me - 'fook you EFC i'll show you what i can do at leeds, a club and fans i've always wanted to play in front of, i'm being sensible about my career as i haven't long left and don't want to be relegated, but rest assured i'm going to do my damnedest to help you stay up and build where this club should be"

Get positive ffs and behind LUFC, and why doesn't anyone here with negative vibes take all their gripes and crying across to Twatter' where they thrive on such. Why feel the need to express all your negativity and griping here on this forums members, i don't get it?
Twatter has none LUFC fans on there proclaiming to be LUFC just on a wind up and they support other clubs, Leeds fans frequent scum boards trying to create fall outs masquerading as scum fans if you go read scum threads they are getting slaughtered on there by so called 'fans', Liverpool fans do it, all trolls do it, they want that kick, and boy are they going to town ever since Fergie left, what an absolute ball they're having saying such and such about their shite manager appointments and transfer spending.

Why do some posters think we want to read all their negative shite, vent it on Twatter, in fact it's very hard to read that Twatter thing because you continually think - " Is this fooking nutter for real?" and "Jesus you'd think he hates the club" and that's because they do.

Aimvho.

[CUSSIE01]

Just my tuppenceworth, forums like this need posters like Cjay, Weasel, SH, Sean, 64, BB, Jaydog, EB etc etc etc……. Without them and their different opinions & input I wouldn’t be on here & every one of the posters on here brings something different. If you don’t agree with something either debate it or ignore it . Seemples

[Jaydog]

Just my tuppenceworth, forums like this need posters like Cjay, Weasel, SH, Sean, 64, BB, Jaydog, EB etc etc etc……. Without them and their different opinions & input I wouldn’t be on here & every one of the posters on here brings something different. If you don’t agree with something either debate it or ignore it . Seemples

[Johnsie123]

Perception is everything. I suggest you start a poll asking the simple question.

What is your perception of Cjay's thoughts on Daniel Farke, are they positive or negative or neutral?

The answers would be enlightening

I don't think CJ is the only 1 who think farke is not the right person for the job of a prem manager,I certainly think he is not the right manager for anyone in the prem,and as I have said before free speech is allowed in this country the last time I looked or am I wrong .

[Sean_Nile]

Just reading back a few pages and misunderstanding some of it?
If you quote someone you're stalking?
If you don't quote someone you're annoying them? I'm a bit lost?

Well said, I wish I could be so concise and logical.

If you rule out those 2 possibility the third option is SILENCE, which might be the true objective.