Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Archive for all MOT match day threads including match previews, in game chat, reports and ratings.
Leeds United v Liverpool
Leeds United
Leeds United
3–3
Premier League
06/12/2025
Elland Road
Liverpool
Liverpool
All-time record vs Liverpool
123
Played
28
Won
33
Drawn
62
Lost
-86
GD
23%
Win %
Home record at Elland Road
60
Played
18
Won
18
Drawn
24
Lost
-12
GD
30%
Win %
DateGroundScoreCompetition
17/04/2023 Elland Road 1–6 L Premier League
29/10/2022 Anfield 1–2 W Premier League
23/02/2022 Anfield 6–0 L Premier League
12/09/2021 Elland Road 0–3 L Premier League
19/04/2021 Elland Road 1–1 D Premier League
All-time top scorers vs Liverpool
#PlayerGoals
1 Tom Jennings 7
2 Mick Jones 6
3 Mark Viduka 6
4 Harry Duggan 5
5 Russell Wainscoat 5
Starting XI
Substitutes
Unused Substitutes
26 Darlow
25 Byram
24 Justin
20 Harrison
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

The Subhuman wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 6:50 pm Much better than Darlow, I rate Mes so that's a toss up
I can't recall Darlow making so many errors.

Sorry, apparently none of the goals we concede aren't Perri's fault.

Let's look at all the goals conceded from our left-hand flank.

It can't be Struijk fault as he is our best defender apparently, and not Gabby as many on here think he is our player of the season.

One point is for certain, is my favourite defender & our most consistent player this season cost us the first goal, and I'm making no excuses for that dreadful pass.
Nord VPN
Stream games in safety! Get NordVPN with up to 75% off + 3 months free
Get NordVPN →
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Cjay wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 6:51 pm Aaronson coming on . . . . .
Brenden played well.
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Irish Ian wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 6:55 pm The direct approach worked with Nmecha alongside DCL. Okafor hasnt been able to play there, which is why we havent been able to use the long balls as effectively.

Without that element to our game we are in diffs.

But anyone calling for Farkes head because of this game is a damn fool.

Subs time
Spot on!

Our supposedly most skilful player Okafor is so lazy.
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Cjay wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 6:55 pm HES GONE BACK TO 4-3-3 HASNT HE
It worked. :-D
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

whiteinfrance wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 6:55 pm I wonder if anyone else thinks so?

Anybody?
Not me!
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

SG90 wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 6:55 pm Gruev should've been off 65 mins ago :lol:
God help us if Ampadu picks up an injury or a suspension (he's on 4 yellows), especially with Longstaff currently unavailable.
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

The Subhuman wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:06 pm WOW, Stach 2-2
Wonderful goal. :tup:
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Orange Box wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:07 pm I’d say DF was the catalyst. His changes.
Brilliant & shrewd changes from Farke.

He isn't bringing on £100m + substitutes.
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

JoeDenver wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:09 pm Great save again from Perri!
It was indeed. :tup:
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

STLWhite wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:15 pm Didn’t pick up the runners first the 3rd. Has that happened before ?
Nothing new there!
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

The Subhuman wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:17 pm Stach has been class again
My MOTM.
DDB220
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 7050
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:17 am

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by DDB220 »

1964white wrote: Sun Dec 07, 2025 12:38 pm Brenden played well.
He tries to make things happen, I like that bravery on the ball. His play leading to the Stach’s goal was quality, it was a great assist incorporating a cheeky 1-2 with Gnonto, who also added an extra dimension and played Konate beautifully for the penalty.
That got us going without a doubt.
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

STLWhite wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:28 pmLimbs !
And the stadium went wild.

Manic in the kop.

:clapp: :clape: :shirtw: :supbo: :scar1
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154875
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

SG90 wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 7:35 pm Fortress ER is back 😍

We're a completely different animal under the lights. Please no more early kick offs. 🙏🙏
ER & under the floodlights is why I predicted two wins.

Not quite, but four points is a great return.
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41604
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

weasel wrote: Sat Dec 06, 2025 11:47 pm What has average time of subs got to do with anything? Who cares what time his 5th sub comes on? He usually makes his first subs halfway through the second half so no change this week apart from the City match where James was injured.
Awkward man, I was being nice :lol:

Ok, he makes his 1st subs one of the latest as well according to an Athletic article earlier this week (and would have been even later but was done after the City game).

So the man had made late largely irrelevant subs.

Up until this week only Wolves had had less impact with their subs.

We've earned nearly as many points 2nd half in the last 3 as we had in the entire season before (still only Wolves have done worse 2nd half).

But it's a significant improvement so credit where it's due.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41604
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

1964white wrote: Sun Dec 07, 2025 12:38 pm Brenden played well.
He did.

My initial reaction was wrong as I said later.

A fair reaction given what's gone before.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41604
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

1964white wrote: Sun Dec 07, 2025 12:41 pm It worked. :-D
It did :)
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 19631
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by weasel »

Cjay wrote: Sun Dec 07, 2025 1:41 pm Awkward man, I was being nice :lol:

Ok, he makes his 1st subs one of the latest as well according to an Athletic article earlier this week (and would have been even later but was done after the City game).

So the man had made late largely irrelevant subs.

Up until this week only Wolves had had less impact with their subs.

We've earned nearly as many points 2nd half in the last 3 as we had in the entire season before (still only Wolves have done worse 2nd half).

But it's a significant improvement so credit where it's due.
Nope you were making an error after googling the time of Leeds susbtitutions and basically copying what AI put where they mixed up average time of all susbstitutions not average time of first substitution. Has always been around the midpoint of the second half where he looks to make subs.

The trouble with stats though is sorting out the relevance. So say Slot makes changes earlier well maybe that is to keep his squad of expensively assembled 'superstars' happy. Farke made changes late in the last 2 seasons - well maybe that was because in most matches we were leading so there was more risk invovled making changes early. Up until a few matches ago we'd not lost under Farke after going in front - as such his timing of substitutions shows we didn't f*ck it up because of changes.

You can also look at the players we have available. Easier to say make an earlier sub if you have £50m+ players on the bench than say a half fit Gnonto or Dan James, or a Byram that you don't want to risk too much.

Yes there are times where maybe Farke could have reacted earlier, equally though that is using the adage of saying that making the changes earlier would have worked. Could just as easily backfired such as when Tanaka was brought on as a sub earlier this season and lost the ball as he wasn't at the intensity of those around him and we conceded.

I would say making a change when leading or holding on to a point and we keep the result is not, as you put it, an irrelevant sub.

Easier for a sub to have an impact when you have a Salah or Cole Palmer on the bench than say a Piroe or Nmecha - and that is not being nasty to either of them but there is a gulf in class and ability to make something out of nothing. The reality of the situation is that most of the teams that we consider to be closer to our level still have players on their bench that on ability would start for us.
Cjay wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:23 pm I've pretended to support a team that's been crap for most of my life as part of a long term plan
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain
User avatar
weasel
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 19631
Joined: Wed May 23, 2007 10:28 pm
Location: Firmly on the Danny-Magnet

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by weasel »

1964white wrote: Sun Dec 07, 2025 12:41 pm It worked. :-D
Poor Cjay - he has to resort to snide digs today to attack Farke and twist every positive to a negative. Such a strange way to live.

Cjay will still be trying to work out why his football manager 532 formation failed.
Cjay wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:23 pm I've pretended to support a team that's been crap for most of my life as part of a long term plan
Victor_Notts-17 wrote: Mon Jun 01, 2026 7:03 pm Did you post them because there's something wrong with your brain
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41604
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Leeds United V Liverpool Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

weasel wrote: Sun Dec 07, 2025 2:09 pm Nope you were making an error after googling the time of Leeds susbtitutions and basically copying what AI put where they mixed up average time of all susbstitutions not average time of first substitution. Has always been around the midpoint of the second half where he looks to make subs.

The trouble with stats though is sorting out the relevance. So say Slot makes changes earlier well maybe that is to keep his squad of expensively assembled 'superstars' happy. Farke made changes late in the last 2 seasons - well maybe that was because in most matches we were leading so there was more risk invovled making changes early. Up until a few matches ago we'd not lost under Farke after going in front - as such his timing of substitutions shows we didn't f*ck it up because of changes.

You can also look at the players we have available. Easier to say make an earlier sub if you have £50m+ players on the bench than say a half fit Gnonto or Dan James, or a Byram that you don't want to risk too much.

Yes there are times where maybe Farke could have reacted earlier, equally though that is using the adage of saying that making the changes earlier would have worked. Could just as easily backfired such as when Tanaka was brought on as a sub earlier this season and lost the ball as he wasn't at the intensity of those around him and we conceded.

I would say making a change when leading or holding on to a point and we keep the result is not, as you put it, an irrelevant sub.

Easier for a sub to have an impact when you have a Salah or Cole Palmer on the bench than say a Piroe or Nmecha - and that is not being nasty to either of them but there is a gulf in class and ability to make something out of nothing. The reality of the situation is that most of the teams that we consider to be closer to our level still have players on their bench that on ability would start for us.
It was in The Athletic, are tons of articles throughout his career about his subs and the lateness and poor impact of them.

He has often struggled to have any sort of impact with them.

We have also gone behind in the vast majority of our games so not making a sub to hold on to a point or a win is irrelevant.

So changing a game with his subs hasn't been a strength.

I felt he made an improvement vs Man City and Liverpool with a change and crucially a different approach.

Rather than his usual like for like subs or his throw everyone on and hope for the best.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
Nord VPN
Stream games in safety! Get NordVPN with up to 75% off + 3 months free
Get NordVPN →
Post Reply