BBC vs MOT Average Ratings.

[1964white]

After the player ratings debate on the Pascal Struijk thread today.

Here are the BBC v MOT ratings.

EVERTON v LEEDS

BBC (black) vs MOT (blue) - Average ratings
7.8 - Justin - 7.4
7.6 - Aaronson - 7.4
7.3 - Darlow - 7.1
7.3 - Ampadu - 7.4
7.2 - Calvert-Lewin - 6.7
7.1 - Bornauw - 7.7
7.0 - Stach - 7.3
7.0 - Struijk - 7.8
6.9 - Bogle - 6.3
6.9 - Rodon - 6.5
6.4 - Gruev - 6.1
6.1 - Okafor - 4.9
6.0 - Buonanotte - 5.8
5.6 - Tanaka - 4.3
5.6 - Longstaff - 4.4

[Carrick Dave]

Just goes to show the BBC are getting it wrong across the board.

[1964white]

Just goes to show the BBC are getting it wrong across the board.

[weasel]

I may be wrong but I think you can vite during the match on the BBC which is bound to schew ratings.

[1964white]

I may be wrong but I think you can vite during the match on the BBC which is bound to schew ratings.

Yes, fans can vote during the games, I made the same point on the other thread,

[Finnatic]

The BBC system is open to anyone who has an account so it’s not necessarily Leeds fans voting.
Sometimes whoever scores the winner or just a goal gets MOTM irrespective of how they played during the game.

[1964white]

The BBC system is open to anyone who has an account so it’s not necessarily Leeds fans voting.
Sometimes whoever scores the winner or just a goal gets MOTM irrespective of how they played during the game.

As Justin did for Leeds.

[Finnatic]

As Justin did for Leeds.

True but he had a good game too, sometimes it’s not the case re BBC

[Jammy 07]

It shows that MOT forum members are very harsh on Okafor.

[The Subhuman]

I didn't score Okafor v Everton, didn't think he was on the pitch long enough

[Carrick Dave]

It shows that MOT forum members are very harsh on Okafor.

More harsh on Tanaka and just as harsh on Longstaff.

[Jammy 07]

More harsh on Tanaka and just as harsh on Longstaff.

That's true regarding the Everton game, however Okafor is still the latest whipping boy on here.

Tanaka is generally loved, demonstrated by many clamouring for him to start.

Longstaff seems to have taken the blame for that 4 game losing run we had and is now considered bang average.

Once the die is cast it takes at least 10 very good performances before posters change their perceptions with Aaronson being a very good example.

[The Subhuman]

That's true regarding the Everton game, however Okafor is still the latest whipping boy on here.

Tanaka is generally loved, demonstrated by many clamouring for him to start.

Longstaff seems to have taken the blame for that 4 game losing run we had and is now considered bang average.

Once the die is cast it takes at least 10 very good performances before posters change their perceptions with Aaronson being a very good example.

I don't think he's that good ....

[Cjay]

That's true regarding the Everton game, however Okafor is still the latest whipping boy on here.

Tanaka is generally loved, demonstrated by many clamouring for him to start.

Longstaff seems to have taken the blame for that 4 game losing run we had and is now considered bang average.

Once the die is cast it takes at least 10 very good performances before posters change their perceptions with Aaronson being a very good example.

Criticising a big money signing for being poor isn't making him a whipping boy? He's been poor.

Aaronson was poor to average for 95% of his time here.

Hardly like they have been unfairly criticised.

Ironically Aaronson has become the new golden boy for some and it's gone the other way.

Longstaff always was bang average . . . . A poor Jordan Henderson who in turn was a poor Steven Gerrard

[1964white]

It seem like our members refuse to post up ratings when we don't play well for the whole 90 minutes

Where were the ratings from those who are being critical of others? who spent their time showing their opinions of individual performances with their ratings.

[1964white]

It shows that MOT forum members are very harsh on Okafor.

I don't think Noah or any of our subs deserved more than a 5.

[1964white]

Criticising a big money signing for being poor isn't making him a whipping boy? He's been poor.

Aaronson was poor to average for 95% of his time here.

Hardly like they have been unfairly criticised.

Ironically Aaronson has become the new golden boy for some and it's gone the other way.

Longstaff always was bang average . . . . A poor Jordan Henderson who in turn was a poor Steven Gerrard

At least you posted up your ratings, Cjay.

[1964white]

I didn't score Okafor v Everton, didn't think he was on the pitch long enough

He was on the pitch as long as Buonanotte & Longstaff, which was about ten minutes, probably not long enough to rate.

Tanaka the only one on the pitch for a substantial amount of time.

[Jammy 07]

Criticising a big money signing for being poor isn't making him a whipping boy? He's been poor.

Aaronson was poor to average for 95% of his time here.

Hardly like they have been unfairly criticised.

Ironically Aaronson has become the new golden boy for some and it's gone the other way.

Longstaff always was bang average . . . . A poor Jordan Henderson who in turn was a poor Steven Gerrard

£17M for Okafor isn't big money though as any top winger is £30M plus these days. Even Dan James was £25M and that was 5 years ago. Expectation therefore should be lowered and on that basis he's probably doing ok.

Aaronson had one season during which he started brightly, faded quite badly and then left. Since returning he was good in the Championship and is now deservedly getting high praise for his performances in the PL. How does that equate to 95% of his performances being poor to average ?

Longstaff started brightly before his performances dropped off and then he was out injured. Now gradually working his way back into contention so maybe let's wait and see before throwing him into the bang average category.

[1964white]

More harsh on Tanaka and just as harsh on Longstaff.

Call me an anorak, but this is when my notes are handy to assess our players

Tanaka match stats.

Very good/good
1 - Defensive header
1 - Block
1 - Tackle
Poor
3 - Poor passes
1 - Slow to track Gueye after an atrocious pass.
1 - Didn't stop the cross.

I can understand why Ao received 5 or under.

5/10 for me.

Difficult to judge the other subs, though Longstaff made one poor corner & also skied a glorious chance into the stands