Inland Revenue

For everything Leeds United related and everything not - Have your say... the Marching on Together way!
Forum rules
Please be sure you are acquainted with the forum rules outlined within our FAQs.

Help support the site by using our Amazon Affiliate link when making any purchases from Amazon.
User avatar
Jason123
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:22 am

Inland Revenue

Post by Jason123 »

Not sure how true it is...

Speaking to the neighbour who has done some work for a guy who has business dealing with the inland revenue

(not making this up)

He said that we are trying our best not to get promoted this season, if we did they maybe a massive Inland Revenue Bill to pay in excess of 20+ Million... Was a clause in the deal when we went under that if we got back in the premier league we were duty bound to pay it back...

Could this be a reason why he seems to want to consolodate our position rather than spend millions and the carefulness of the business he is conducting.

Just filling you in on conversation this afternoon...
Image
User avatar
YorkshireSquare
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15035
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 1:34 pm
Twitter: @motforum
Location: Leeds
Contact:

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by YorkshireSquare »

We came out of admin without a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA), hence the 15 point deduction so I don't beleive any such clauses exist.

I beleive we aren't spending because there isn't that much cash to spend.
User avatar
Jason123
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:22 am

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Jason123 »

Shields53 wrote:We came out of admin without a Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA), hence the 15 point deduction so I don't beleive any such clauses exist.

I beleive we aren't spending because there isn't that much cash to spend.

True just saying what my neighbour said not sure weather it was right would not suprise me though if they had a big secret at leeds they dont even tell us when players are getting to fitness what is another lie lol.....

Agree not much money about... If Somma can repeat form then SG may have judged him right...
Image
User avatar
Twiggster
MOT Legend
MOT Legend
Posts: 23104
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 2:31 pm
Location: near København, DK
Contact:

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Twiggster »

Seems so long ago now - tho it is only 3 years.....but I do remember some clause that we'd have to pay creditors off in full, if we got back into the Prem within 5 years after going into administration?
But I think that was the original administration deal, when we were "old club".
The taxman stepped in and the "new club" was formed and as Shieldsy says - the CVA was rejected and we got the points deduction.
The debts were under the "old club", so I reckon there is no way the "new club" can be penalised for the "old clubs" debts.

mattj13
Youth Team
Youth Team
Posts: 92
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2008 6:41 pm
Location: Pontefract

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by mattj13 »

I got told by someone at BT we never pay our phone bill :lol:

Its true that about the 5 years and Inland Revenue, but this isn't the reason Leeds wont go up, consolidation is the key this year.
User avatar
leedsunited4eva
Ballboy
Ballboy
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:04 pm
Location: Belle Isle, leeds

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by leedsunited4eva »

Even if it was true and we did get promoted we could afford it, the prize money for promotion should easily cover it. look at Blackpool, didn't they get 90 million for making it to the premiership???
Image
User avatar
CSA
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2392
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: South Leeds.

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by CSA »

I heared it from a reliable source today that if we get promoted this season we will be automatically relegated to league 2.
Get a grip folks !!!
Image
joluafc4eva

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by joluafc4eva »

CSA wrote:I heared it from a reliable source today that if we get promoted this season we will be automatically relegated to league 2.
Get a grip folks !!!
:-D :-D
User avatar
Twiggster
MOT Legend
MOT Legend
Posts: 23104
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 2:31 pm
Location: near København, DK
Contact:

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Twiggster »

CSA wrote:I heared it from a reliable source today
Poster Location: South Leeds......... :lol:
User avatar
Ronan
Manager
Manager
Posts: 2898
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 4:39 pm
Location: Belfast

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Ronan »

....i wouldn't worry too much......not the way the HMRC is being run at the moment !! :?
Most plagiarists, like the drone, have neither taste to select, industry to acquire, nor skill to improve, but impudently pilfer the honey ready prepared, from the hive......
User avatar
CSA
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2392
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: South Leeds.

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by CSA »

Twiggster wrote: Poster Location: South Leeds......... :lol:
Sauces :-D don't get more reliable than mine
Image
Drs.Dad
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3048
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:20 pm

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Drs.Dad »

Jason123 wrote:Not sure how true it is...

Speaking to the neighbour who has done some work for a guy who has business dealing with the inland revenue

(not making this up)

He said that we are trying our best not to get promoted this season, if we did they maybe a massive Inland Revenue Bill to pay in excess of 20+ Million... Was a clause in the deal when we went under that if we got back in the premier league we were duty bound to pay it back...

Could this be a reason why he seems to want to consolodate our position rather than spend millions and the carefulness of the business he is conducting.

Just filling you in on conversation this afternoon...
Quotation taken directly from the Leeds United Annual Accounts for the last two years.........


"In the event of the club reaching the FA Premier League before 2017 a liability of £5,000,000 would be incurred under the terms of the acquisition of the business from Leeds United Association Football Club Limited"


:spider:
Image
User avatar
Twiggster
MOT Legend
MOT Legend
Posts: 23104
Joined: Thu May 22, 2003 2:31 pm
Location: near København, DK
Contact:

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Twiggster »

A liability payment to WHO tho Docdad?
Creditors ceased to exist surely, when "new club" was formed? All debts were with "old club"?

Jeez mate - don't you wish for the good old days, when all we had to worry about was if Jones and Lash would be fit for Saturday? :roll:


User avatar
Jason123
First Team
First Team
Posts: 1342
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:22 am

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Jason123 »

Taken from no website..... ffs

Dont live in South Leeds either!
Image
User avatar
CSA
First Team
First Team
Posts: 2392
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:46 pm
Location: South Leeds.

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by CSA »

Jason123 wrote:Taken from no website..... ffs

Dont live in South Leeds either!
Wish i had a pound for all the rumours surrounding LUFC. chill pal we are OK promotion or not.
Image
Drs.Dad
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3048
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:20 pm

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Drs.Dad »

Twiggster wrote:A liability payment to WHO tho Docdad?
Creditors ceased to exist surely, when "new club" was formed? All debts were with "old club"?

Jeez mate - don't you wish for the good old days, when all we had to worry about was if Jones and Lash would be fit for Saturday? :roll:



It doesn't say Billy, that is the sentence in it's entirety, and no other reference to the debt elsewhere, but if the club acknowledges it in the annual accounts, then it certainly exists (it's probably the taxman, they NEVER give up on 'their' money. :evil:
Image
User avatar
Martyn
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 10635
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:47 am
Twitter: @MartynStead
Location: and Momentum both uncertain

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Martyn »

Drs.Dad wrote:
It doesn't say Billy, that is the sentence in it's entirety, and no other reference to the debt elsewhere, but if the club acknowledges it in the annual accounts, then it certainly exists (it's probably the taxman, they NEVER give up on 'their' money. :evil:
But do remember - it's not "their" money, it's ours as taxpayers. It's a fair question as to why a tax-exile living in Monaco should be allowed to get away with deducting tax from the players' salaries but not passing it over to HMRC.
Bates, GFH, Cellino: Same s**t, different arseholes.
Drs.Dad
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3048
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:20 pm

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Drs.Dad »

Guildford White wrote:[
But do remember - it's not "their" money, it's ours as taxpayers. It's a fair question as to why a tax-exile living in Monaco should be allowed to get away with deducting tax from the players' salaries but not passing it over to HMRC.

Which is why I put the their in speech quotes! Have a look at Papa's programme notes in Saturdays programme, He says that he paid tax on the money he got from selling Chelsea, then moved to Monaco, and has had no direct income since, thus is not avoiding any tax in the UK, he lives there 'cos he likes it and wants to!
:shock:
Image
User avatar
Martyn
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 10635
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 10:47 am
Twitter: @MartynStead
Location: and Momentum both uncertain

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by Martyn »

Drs.Dad wrote:
Which is why I put the their in speech quotes! Have a look at Papa's programme notes in Saturdays programme, He says that he paid tax on the money he got from selling Chelsea, then moved to Monaco, and has had no direct income since, thus is not avoiding any tax in the UK, he lives there 'cos he likes it and wants to!
:shock:
And as always, I believe every word the kindly old gentleman says.
Bates, GFH, Cellino: Same s**t, different arseholes.
User avatar
YorkshireSquare
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 15035
Joined: Sun May 18, 2003 1:34 pm
Twitter: @motforum
Location: Leeds
Contact:

Re: Inland Revenue

Post by YorkshireSquare »

Drs.Dad wrote: no direct income since
Hmm, notice the use of the words 'direct income', obviously it doesnt count if your money comes through various trusts and off shore accounts, its not direct then so obviously shouldn't be taxable. :roll:
Post Reply