Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Archive for all MOT match day threads including match previews, in game chat, reports and ratings.
Post Reply
Manchester City v Leeds United
Manchester City
Manchester City
3–2
Premier League
29/11/2025
Etihad Stadium
Leeds United
Leeds United
All-time record vs Manchester City
112
Played
43
Won
18
Drawn
51
Lost
-36
GD
38%
Win %
Away record
56
Played
14
Won
9
Drawn
33
Lost
-53
GD
25%
Win %
DateGroundScoreCompetition
06/05/2023 Etihad Stadium 2–1 L Premier League
28/12/2022 Elland Road 1–3 L Premier League
30/04/2022 Elland Road 0–4 L Premier League
14/12/2021 Etihad Stadium 7–0 L Premier League
10/04/2021 Etihad Stadium 1–2 W Premier League
All-time top scorers vs Manchester City
#PlayerGoals
1 Peter Lorimer 7
2 Charlie Keetley 5
3 Allan Clarke 5
4 Jack Charlton 4
5 John White 3
Starting XI
1 Perri
2 Bogle
24 Justin
6 Rodon
4 Ampadu ©
22 Tanaka
44 Gruev
7 James
29 Gnonto
14 Nmecha
Substitutes
Unused Substitutes
16 Meslier
25 Byram
20 Harrison
10 Piroe
User avatar
CUSSIE01
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 9654
Joined: Fri Jun 30, 2023 6:45 am
Location: Where God finally got it right.

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by CUSSIE01 »

Hewin wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 4:30 pm It's the hope that kills you :zip:
It certainly did.
“ If you’re going to try, go all the way. Otherwise don’t even start “ Charles Bukowski.
Nord VPN
Stream games in safety! Get NordVPN with up to 75% off + 3 months free
Get NordVPN →
Corkwhites
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
Posts: 687
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2023 7:32 am

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Corkwhites »

Thought we deserved a point. Second half was a big improvement for Leeds, but looking back on it, did we drag City down to our level. Next couple of games will make or break us.
User avatar
Tyzy
Manager
Manager
Posts: 4184
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2021 7:09 pm
Location: Leeds

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Tyzy »

Maybe we just can't play with the intensity of the 2nd half for the full 90 mins ?
User avatar
Jaydog
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 21177
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:52 pm
Location: Here

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Jaydog »

Cjay wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:21 pm We can agree to disagree.

Doesn't change anything imo.

It just shows that when the team is used how it is meant to be then it isn't as bad as it looks.

Makes you wonder then why we have been playing more Farke style for so long with little success? And that isn't just my view, The Athletic highlighted it themselves this week.

Why does it take an appalling 1st half and likely a the sack for Farke to show any sort of flexibility? Where has this been the last 5, 6 game
Not sure what we are disagreeing on 😆

I’m just a fact based person. HT it was 2-0 not 4-0 or 5-0 and the tactics 2nd half very nearly got us a point. Little bit of tiredness in closing Foden down but a good finish nonetheless to win it.
I thought Farke said subs dont impact a game 🤔
Anyway from what I saw we could definitely stay up if Farke adapts and if not then he should go.
So we agree 👍🏼
I declare my love for Saint Daniel and I can shoehorn him in to any conversation.
User avatar
Irish Ian
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 17175
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 5:53 pm
Location: Directly above the centre of the Earth.

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Irish Ian »

Foden saves the blushes of the anti farke brigade.
'
"Football is about the people and the players,” he said. “Then there are those who will mingle in the middle: the coaches, executives and journalists. That last group represents the worst part about football" Marcelo Bielsa
User avatar
The Subhuman
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 78686
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 10:03 am
Location: God's own county

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by The Subhuman »

Ellandback1 wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:30 pm Didn't we play 532 - 352 under Wilko?
When Rio arrived and we were poor for a few games while it settled. So under O'Leary
Last edited by The Subhuman on Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"A mind is like a parachute, it doesn't work if it's not open"
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41521
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

Jaydog wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:35 pm Not sure what we are disagreeing on 😆

I’m just a fact based person. HT it was 2-0 not 4-0 or 5-0 and the tactics 2nd half very nearly got us a point. Little bit of tiredness in closing Foden down but a good finish nonetheless to win it.
I thought Farke said subs dont impact a game 🤔
Anyway from what I saw we could definitely stay up if Farke adapts and if not then he should go.
So we agree 👍🏼
Not quite

I'd sack him more than ever :lol:

For making the team look worse than it is for months with his stubborn ploddy crap tactics.

And a plucky 45 minutes finally doing what many fans asked for ages ago doesn't change thay for me.

45 minutes vs 6 defeats in 7 including vs teams currently 16th,19th and 15th

As I said imo it's literally Jesse Marsch vs Liverpool again

(I know negative Cjay
Last edited by Cjay on Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
JoeDenver
Manager
Manager
Posts: 4113
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:58 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by JoeDenver »

BlackHillsPaul wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:09 pm Well, I've got to give Farke some credit here. The substitutions and change of formation at HT made a huge difference! I can't remember a time when this Manager has really put his stamp on the match. But he did it in this one. I really can't criticize him. I thought he got it right today. I thought we really deserved a draw today. A bit unlucky to concede in stoppage time. But that was a brilliant goal from Foden!!

This game was a bit of a free punch for us. We didn't expect to win. But the HT changes, and a real resolve by the players made it interesting. Something to build upon. And Farke CLEARLY has not lost the team. They are still fighting for him!
Agree a fair amount, Paul. Am wondering if it’s equivalent to Jesse’s Liverpool match. Need to start with the back 3 for next match and see if a breakthrough has occurred.
Fly Fishing, Skiing, and The Damned United
User avatar
Madron
Manager
Manager
Posts: 3636
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2021 7:46 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Madron »

Cjay wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:40 pm Not quite

I'd sack him more than ever :lol:

For making the team look worse than it is for months with his stubborn ploddy crap tactics.

And a plucky 45 minutes finally doing what many fans asked for ages ago doesn't change thay for me.

As I said imo it's literally Jesse Marsch vs Liverpool again

(I know negative Cjay
Its literally not.
ffs
User avatar
Supersaint3
Youth Team
Youth Team
Posts: 94
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:59 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Supersaint3 »

Irish Ian wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:36 pm Foden saves the blushes of the anti farke brigade.
That's a bit silly :|

It was a free shot half and I was willing them to do it but if we're honest we looked like conceding from minute 75 on it was coming...

What today showed me is that there is a team there that is being held too tight on a leash by an over cautious and indecisive manager
Leeds and St. Patricks Athletic FC!
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41521
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

Madron wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:50 pm Its literally not.
ffs
It literally is

An unexpected performance in a game most expected a hammering (didn't get the win this time but all the same).

And people start forgetting the previous 7.5 8.5 games and think "ahh well that was plucky perhaps its all going to be fine the players fight for him".

The conversations on here were identical.

Doesn't alter the fact we've less points now than we were relegated with and have lost 6 of 7
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
SG90
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 23017
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by SG90 »

Cjay wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:40 pm Not quite

I'd sack him more than ever :lol:

For making the team look worse than it is for months with his stubborn ploddy crap tactics.

And a plucky 45 minutes finally doing what many fans asked for ages ago doesn't change thay for me.

45 minutes vs 6 defeats in 7 including vs teams currently 16th,19th and 15th

As I said imo it's literally Jesse Marsch vs Liverpool again

(I know negative Cjay
The big difference is Marsch actually won. Farke is being praised for losing once again. :lol:

Perhaps we could bring back Jesse for the Chelski and Liverpool games :duno:
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154681
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Jaydog wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:35 pm Not sure what we are disagreeing on 😆

I’m just a fact based person. HT it was 2-0 not 4-0 or 5-0 and the tactics 2nd half very nearly got us a point. Little bit of tiredness in closing Foden down but a good finish nonetheless to win it.
I thought Farke said subs dont impact a game 🤔
Anyway from what I saw we could definitely stay up if Farke adapts and if not then he should go.
So we agree 👍🏼
Good teams find a way to win matches when they are up against it.

A class finish from Foden sealed the victory.

The fact we concede so many goals in the final 20 minutes is a major concern.
User avatar
Jaydog
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 21177
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2022 9:52 pm
Location: Here

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Jaydog »

Cjay wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:40 pm Not quite

I'd sack him more than ever :lol:

For making the team look worse than it is for months with his stubborn ploddy crap tactics.

And a plucky 45 minutes finally doing what many fans asked for ages ago doesn't change thay for me.

45 minutes vs 6 defeats in 7 including vs teams currently 16th,19th and 15th

As I said imo it's literally Jesse Marsch vs Liverpool again

(I know negative Cjay
Hang on a minute. So you dont like Farke.
I only just noticed 😆

Sunderland imo have gone about it the right way not just in recruitment but in the their belief that they are as good as the opposition. Even Arsenal.
We dont seem to have that attitude.

And the quality replacements definitely wont be lining up to replace Farke. We might end up with Marsch mark 2
I declare my love for Saint Daniel and I can shoehorn him in to any conversation.
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41521
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

SG90 wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:02 pm The big difference is Marsch actually won. Farke is being praised for losing once again. :lol:

Perhaps we could bring back Jesse for the Chelski and Liverpool games :duno:
:lol:

I credit the changes many had called for but I don't agree a plucky 45 minutes changes anything

That's short term small picture thinking imo.

I realise many may disagree.
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
BlackHillsPaul
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 4496
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2022 5:53 pm
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by BlackHillsPaul »

JoeDenver wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:49 pm Agree a fair amount, Paul. Am wondering if it’s equivalent to Jesse’s Liverpool match. Need to start with the back 3 for next match and see if a breakthrough has occurred.
Well, Jesse's side WON the Liverpool match so.... ;-)

I agree with you that we need to start with 3 Centerbacks. But I also like the 2 forward look. So 3-5-2 or 5-3-2 depending on the opponent seems like it could be a better set up for us. And we need to find a way to get Joel Piroe some minutes in one of the forward spots. We are leaving goals on the bench with him. I would give him a run of games to see what he can do at this level.
Football/Futbol/Soccer
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154681
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

Tyzy wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 5:35 pm Maybe we just can't play with the intensity of the 2nd half for the full 90 mins ?
Just look how many goals we concede is proof of your comment.
User avatar
Cjay
Superstar
Superstar
Posts: 41521
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 3:01 pm

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Cjay »

Jaydog wrote: Sat Nov 29, 2025 6:04 pm Hang on a minute. So you dont like Farke.
I only just noticed 😆

Sunderland imo have gone about it the right way not just in recruitment but in the their belief that they are as good as the opposition. Even Arsenal.
We dont seem to have that attitude.

And the quality replacements definitely wont be lining up to replace Farke. We might end up with Marsch mark 2
:)

The clubs have different attitudes, look at the top 10 spend every penny stuff the owners and manager of Sunderland have been saying.

All we got was Farke and his 1ppg and mentioning newly promoted club every 5 minutes and the owners document thing literally saying they are aiming just to survive for a few seasons.

Different attitudes and ambition
Signed

King Cjay

Fountain of all knowledge and wisdom
User avatar
1964white
Lord Southwold
Lord Southwold
Posts: 154681
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:46 am
Twitter: @1964white

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by 1964white »

That narrow defeat has papered over the cracks!
User avatar
Pullhard
Site Contributor
Site Contributor
Posts: 2959
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2020 8:23 am

Re: Manchester City v Leeds United Match Thread

Post by Pullhard »

We seem to have 60 or 70 minutes in us. Today it was the back end of the game. Usually we start at 100 miles an hour and run out of steam.
Very difficult to maintain the high intensity over 90 mins
Nord VPN
Stream games in safety! Get NordVPN with up to 75% off + 3 months free
Get NordVPN →
Post Reply